# shadow of the torturer and thomas co - (nf)

*The SF-Lovers list — 2 messages, 2 voices, undated*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/sflovers/14>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### hplabs!hpda!bvi
*undated*

Hmmm... No, the only correlation between Donaldson and Wolfe that
I share is that they're both hard to get into.  However, whereas I
*forced* myself to finish the 1st Donaldson book, and had absolutely
*no* interest in reading any more in the sequence, I found I couldn't
put Shadow of the Torturer down once I got about 1/4 of the way into
it.  It does take a bit of getting used to, because Wolfe writes in a
deliberately obscure manner that forces you to use more imagination
than most other SF books.  I found that Severian and the whole culture
portrayed in the book fascinating; I finished SoT in one sitting and
ran out the next day to buy the other three books, which I finished
post haste.  I only wish there were more!

Beatriz Infante

---

### hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd70!packet!cfv
*undated · follows hplabs!hpda!bvi*

I seem to have had a similar response to SotT.  It took me about
3 months to finish the book, but the first quarter of the book took
all but 4 days of it.  It was not that I didn't like the book, but it
is an involved and thought provoking book and you have to be in the
proper frame of mind.  If you don't feel like involving yourself in
the book, it just doesn't work.  I have a similar response to movies:
some days I feel like Fellini, some days I feel like the Marx
Brothers.

     One thing that I noticed (someone out there want to back me up on
this?)  when reading it was that the feel of the New Sun books was
very close to the works of Kafka.  As it turned out, I was reading
some of Kafka's short works about the time I read SotT, so it might
just be a reaction to that, but it almost felt like he was using a
work like The Castle as a philosphical base.  There is also a lot of
classical literature entertwined into the fabric of the story,
especially the Greek and Roman mythologies.

     I haven't read the Covenant yet. Maybe I should... Is it really a
good work?

> From the dungeons of the Warlock:

Chuck Von Rospach
ucbvax!amd70!packet!cfv
(chuqui@mit-mc)  <- obsolete!

---
