# unsuscribe

*The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 20 Jul 1998*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1017>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Internet Megantic
*20 Jul 1998, 09:53*

unsuscribe

> At 03:43 20-07-98 -0700, you wrote:
> 
> -------------- BEGIN urth.v017.n006 --------------
> 
>    001 - adam louis stephanides <a - Severian and the White Fountain
>    002 - adam louis stephanides <a - Il (Peter) Principe
>    003 - Internet Megantic <suppor - unsuscribe- Digest urth.v017.n005
>    004 - "Alex David Groce" <adgro - Eleanor Bold
>    005 - "J. Schultz" <jschultz@wc - Autarch
>    006 - m.driussi at genie.com       - (urth) Questions Keep Questing
>    007 - mary whalen <marewhalen@y - (urth) David as Maitre 2
>    008 - mary whalen <marewhalen@y - (urth) Fifth Head miscellaney
>    009 - Peter Westlake <peter@har - Re: (urth) Islands in Commonwealth
>    010 - mary whalen <marewhalen@y - Re: (urth) Islands in Commonwealth
> 
> URTH Digest -- for discussion of Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other works
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.1 ---------------
> 
> From: adam louis stephanides <astephan at students.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: Severian and the White Fountain
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 12:15:42 -0500 (CDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> In-Reply-To: <199807142021.NAA29492 at lists1.best.com>
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 14 Jul 1998 Christopher R. Culver wrote:

>> Adam asked:

>>> Why is it necessary for anybody to "bring the White Fountain" to Urth?  Why
>>> can't the Hierogrammates just send it?<

>> This is, IMHO, rather simple. The Hierogrammates are theological beings who
>> serve the Pancreator. As such, they judge the sentient beings of their area
>> and decide whether those people are deserving of a miracle.

> What I meant to ask was not "Why don't the Hierogrammates distributes
> White Fountains to everybody who need one?" but "Having decided to give
> Urth a White Fountain, why don't they simply send Severian back to Urth,
> assuring him the White Fountain will be along shortly?  Why go through
> this routine of having Severian "become" the White Fountain as well, which
> he then "guides" to Urth, or at least believes he does.

>> Also: > <And if someone has to bring it, why must it be an Autarch?>
>> 
>> Severian mentions on the Ship of Tzadkiel that the Autarch is by right the
>> representative of Urth to the Hierodules, even though he rules a small
>> portion
>> of it. 

> True, but Severian's "trial" is not, as he origingally believes, to
> determine his or Urth's moral fitness to receive the New Sun, but to
> determine the likelihood of his successfully bringing the New Sun.  So
> it's not obvious why the New Sun needs to be brought by an ex officio
> "representative of Urth."
> 
> --Adam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.2 ---------------
> 
> From: adam louis stephanides <astephan at students.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: Il (Peter) Principe
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 16:35:59 -0500 (CDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> In-Reply-To: <199807140634.XAA22362 at lists1.best.com>
> 
> 
> mantis,
> 
> I was away for a few days, or I would have responded to your post earlier.
> I have a few minor cavils, which I'll discuss elsewhere, but I found it
> admirably clear and enlightening.
> 
> Unfortunately, it only leaves me more baffled regarding _Urth_ as a whole.
> In fact, it now seems to me that _Urth_ is at least as obscure as
> _Castleview_.  To start with, the Hierodules have been supporting the
> "rickety" political structure of the Commonwealth for a thousand years or
> more, apparently solely so that at the end of this time Severian, the
> man destined to bring the New Sun, will be Autarch.  This is too
> reminiscent of _The Sirens of Titan_ for my taste.  More to the point, it
> makes even more urgent the questions I asked in an earlier post: why must
> an Urthman bring the New Sun, why an Autarch, and why Severian?  I'm not
> as confident that the answers I gave are correct as I was then, but I
> haven't seen any better answers.  For that matter, I'm doubtful about the
> whole punishment-and-redemption-of-Urth schema: if the "redemption"
> involves wiping out 99.9% of Urth's population, one would think the
> "punishment" could be dispensed with as superfluous.
> 
> I'm also baffled by the course of events surrounding Severian's "trial."
> Why is he led to think that his trial will be like his predecessor's?  Is
> it just so he will be a more humane ruler as Autarch?  But then why isn't
> he told the truth as soon as he leaves Urth?
> 
> And what is the function of the battle royal between the sailors and the
> aquastors?  Were the Hierogrammates really willing, after all those years
> of preparation, to risk the survival of their race on the outcome of that
> battle?  
> 
> In short, your post made me realize that so far, the first half of _Urth_
> doesn't make sense for me.  Any help you, or anyone else of course, can
> give me would be most appreciated.  (If this post seems querulous, it's a
> reflection of my desperation.)
> 
> --Adam
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.3 ---------------
> 
> From: Internet Megantic <support at megantic.net>
> Subject: unsuscribe- Digest urth.v017.n005
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 17:32:19 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> At 21:10 18-07-98 -0700, you wrote:

>> -------------- BEGIN urth.v017.n005 --------------
>> 
>>    001 - "William H. Ansley" <wans - Re: (urth) Sev's Dad; Aztecs in Space
>>    002 - "Robert Borski" <rborski@ - Sanderson's Abandonment
>>    003 - "Alice Turner" <al@interp - Re: Digest urth.v017.n004
>>    004 - Derek Bell <dbell at maths.t - Re: (urth) Sev's Dad; Aztecs in Space
>>    005 - raster at highfiber.com (Cha - Re: Claudius
>> 
>> URTH Digest -- for discussion of Gene Wolfe's New Sun and other works
>> 
>> 
>> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n005.1 ---------------
>> 
>> From: "William H. Ansley" <wansley at warwick.net>
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Sev's Dad; Aztecs in Space
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 23:50:38 -0400
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> In-Reply-To: <199807180216.TAA14355 at lists1.best.com>

>>> One of the more puzzling names in THE FIFTH HEAD OF CERBERUS to be sourced
>>> is the Country of Friends. It's cited by the abos as the possible homeport
>>> of the star-faring Homo sapiens pangalacticus, who've traveled to Saint
>>> Anne in the distant past, and mentioned in the same breath as Atlantis and
>>> Gondwanaland.
>>> 
>>> I'm now speculating it relates to the Aztecs.
>>> 
>>> This is because Texas--where Gene Wolfe grew up--is derived from the Indian
>>> word "texia," meaning "friends." And since Texas was once part of Mexico,
>>> it's possible the Country of Friends generally refers to Aztecan
>>> civilization.

>> I like this too.
>> 
>> I have a nagging idea that the phrase "the Country of Friends" occurs
>> elsewhere in Wolfe and I have seen it recently in my rereading. If I find
>> the reference, I will certainly post.
>> 
>> William Ansley
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n005.2 ---------------
>> 
>> From: "Robert Borski" <rborski at coredcs.com>
>> Subject: Sanderson's Abandonment
>> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 23:26:00 -0500
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> 
>> Earlier, in regards to my Continuing Westward post, Sean Whalen (aka prion)
>> wrote:
>> 
>> "This seems to fit, but how does it fit in that he originally thought
>> that she stabbed Sanderson?  He didn't just decide to leave him, he
>> thought that he was dead."
>> 
>> This may relate to some aspect of a Kipling short story (The Phantom
>> Rickshaw?), but I'm not sure--it's been 30+ years since I read SOLDIERS
>> THREE and the other collections. Or it may be simple irony. Paris, the
>> Great Seducer, undone by his own lust (whereas the Paris of legend stakes a
>> claim to the most beautiful woman in the world and precipitates a war).
>> 
>> Of course, all of the Homeric correspondences are rather loosely clumped
>> together--hence the notion of Greek Odysseus and Trojan Paris as
>> shipmates--so the search for parallels my be intriniscally flawed to begin
>> with, at least if we expect 100% fidelity with the Illiad/Odyssey.
>> 
>> Also, what I forgot to mention in my Cherry Jubilee piece is that KGB agent
>> Vera Oussenko, who, as you mention, is arrested, represents truth, which
>> she is seeking, even though she gets it wrong (Vera = veritas), only in the
>> inverted value system of CJ she's "punished"--not being allowed to
>> disembark, she's spared the hell of Mars.
>> 
>> Robert Borski
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n005.3 ---------------
>> 
>> From: "Alice Turner" <al at interport.net>
>> Subject: Re: Digest urth.v017.n004
>> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 03:16:27 -0400
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain;
>> charset="iso-8859-1"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>>> Don't know if this has been brought up before, but if Owen/Ouen is
>>> considered to be the Welsh/Celtic equivalent of Eugene, doesn't that mean
>>> Sev's father might also be called Gene?

>> From the Oxford book of English Christian names:
>> 
>> OWEN: a common Welsh name; in Middle English romances often spelled Owain,
>> Owayne, Ywain. It has been supposed to be derived from Latin Eugenius...see
>> Ewan. (Ouen)
>> 
>> EWEN: this name, now confined to Scotland, was once common in England...It
>> is probably the same as Irish and Gaelic Eoghan 'a youth,' which is frequent
>> in Celtic legend and history. Eoghan is usually derived from Primitive
>> Celtic Eugenius  'well-born,' from which is derived Old Welsh Euguein which
>> later became Middle Welsh Ewein, Ywein, whence modern Welsh Owain, Owen.
>> 
>> Bravo, scolex. Thank you.
>> 
>> -alga-
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n005.4 ---------------
>> 
>> From: Derek Bell <dbell at maths.tcd.ie>
>> Subject: Re: (urth) Sev's Dad; Aztecs in Space
>> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 19:22:08 +0100
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Jul 1998 23:50:38 EDT."
>>             <199807180352.UAA19972 at lists1.best.com>
>> 
>> In message <199807180352.UAA19972 at lists1.best.com>, "William H. Ansley"

writes:

>>> I have a nagging idea that the phrase "the Country of Friends" occurs
>>> elsewhere in Wolfe and I have seen it recently in my rereading. If I find
>>> the reference, I will certainly post.

>> I think it's in the short story _Feather Tigers_, IIRC. It
>> occurs in the dialog between the main protagonist and the sky(space?)
>> yacht.
>> 
>> Derek
>> 
>> 
>> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n005.5 ---------------
>> 
>> From: raster at highfiber.com (Charles Dye)
>> Subject: Re: Claudius
>> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 12:36:57 -0600 (MDT)
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> 
>> CRCulver at aol.com writes:

>>> Alex:
>>> < Has there been any discussion on the list (sorry, I'm new and haven't had
>>> time to exhaustively browse the archives) of similarities between
>>> Severian and
>>> Claudius, both the historical emperor and the charming narrator of the two
>>> Robert Graves novels?>

>>> The point that comes to mind first is that both Claudius and Severian plan to
>>> write a manuscript they believe no one will read and get rid of it in a lead
>>> coffer.

>> The dead giveaway, for me anyhow, was the scene where Severian produces one
>> of 'his' aes in the era of Typhon:
>> 
>>    He examined it, bit it, and gave it back to me.  "Gold all right.
>>    Looks a trifle like you, 'cept he seems to have got himself cut up.
>>    Don't suppose you noticed."
>> 
>>    "No," I said.  "I never thought of it."
>> 
>>    Hadelin nodded and pushed back his chair.  "A man doesn't shave himself
>>    sidewise.  See you in the morning, sieur, madame."
>> 
>> Compare with a scene from "Claudius the God" chapter 6 :
>> 
>>    It pleased my vanity to have my head on the coins....  Portraits on
>>    coins, however, are always disappointing because they are executed in
>>    profile, and it comes as a shock, when one sees it in a portrait, that
>>    one really looks like that to people standing beside one.  For one's
>>    full face, because of the familiarity that mirrors give it, a certain
>>    toleration and even affection is felt; but I must say that when I first
>>    saw the model that the mint-masters were striking for me I grew angry
>>    and asked whether it was intended to be a caricature.
>> 
>> Robert Graves once did a translation of "The Lives of the Twelve Caesars"
>> in which each Emperor's chapter was illustrated with the appropriate aureus.
>> 
>> raster at highfiber.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --------------- END urth.v017.n005 ---------------
>> 
>> 
>> *More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/

> /Serges
> Internet Megantic
> http://www.megantic.net/
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.4 ---------------
> 
> From: "Alex David Groce" <adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu>
> Subject: Eleanor Bold
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 21:57:36 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> I've often wondered if the name "Eleanor Bold" in PEACE is simply a
> coincidence, or is intended to mean something.  I've seen Wolfe refer to
> Trollope before, particularly in an essay or interview when he was discussing
> the value to a writer of having a job other than writing (I think this is in
> CASTLE OF DAYS).  So, it seems reasonable to assume Wolfe's read BARCHESTER
> TOWERS, and possibly all of the Barchester books, and it is an intentional
> effect.  But what exactly is it supposed to suggest?  Any ideas?
> 
> -- 
> "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." - John 8:32
> --
> Alex David Groce (adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu)
> Senior (Computer Science/Multidisciplinary Studies in Technology & Fiction)
> '98-99 NCSU AITP Student Chapter President
> 608 Charleston Road, Apt. 1E (919)-233-7366
> http://www4.ncsu.edu/~adgroce
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.5 ---------------
> 
> From: "J. Schultz" <jschultz at wcnet.org>
> Subject: Autarch
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 22:42:38 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> It takes me a while to get around to reading all my mail.  This is in
> response to the difference between Autarch and Monarch.  As we have all
> figured by now Autarch means one who rules themselves.  This idea works into
> one of the themes I see present in the first set of books (tBotNS).  At each
> step in Severian's development we see him cast off the power of one
> authority after another.  He breaks his ties from the authority of the
> guild, the Archon and his post as Lictor, Typhon, etc.  It all leads up to
> the point where just before the Lake people attack the castle of Baldanders,
> when Severian says (to paraphrase) I began to follow the Increate's
> authority above all others.  Severian has become his own man, as it were.
> He decides for himself what is right and wrong, moral and evil, with a
> personal relationship with God.  Thus I feel that the title "Autarch" is
> symbolic of this change and that the title has more thematic meaning, rather
> than any real practical meaning in the way of legal proceedure.  A rose is a
> rose is a rose.  Or, it doesn't really matter what you call him, the idea is
> that he is the top dog and no one is higher, the one man who rules himself.
> As we find out, however, the Autarch is the subject of the Hierodules and
> other higher powers (at least in some sense of the word).  We can't forget
> that the message of tBotNS is basically spiritual and religious, whether we
> like it or not.  In my mind it is the redemption of a torturer who is lost
> in an immoral and decaying world.
> 
> As far as what would have happened had Appian let Severian enter Yesod, he
> most likely would have failed having not learned the important lessons that
> were to come.  However, He would have EATEN Appian's brains AT THAT TIME.
> Appian even says, "Gee, sorry I'm so shocked but I thought I had more time."
> Which leads me to believe that Appian knows that Sev will take the throne
> and he knows that to take the throne he (Appian) has to be dead.  I would
> balk too if my replacement walked in the door and said, "Well, I'm ready,
> take me to the garden and get your brains ready."  While Sev doesn't say
> this it is percieved this way by Appian.
> 
> Let me say that the story has already faded in my mind and mingled with half
> ideas, my own experiences, and the way I would like it to be.  (as I'm sure
> happens to us all)
> 
> One timeless question  (FunkMonkey steps in line behind hundreds of
> philosophers, ancient to modern)   How much free will does Severian have?
> When does Tra. KNOW Severain has passed.  Have they engineered him from the
> begining and so no test is needed?  He has some power from the White
> Fountain long before heading into space, as Sev himself says, 'as if the
> presentment of his future came back through time to him.'  Assuming he
> raised Triskle from the dead he has had his 'powers' from the begining.
> Everyone on Urth in Sev's time knows of the Concilliator.  The Concilliator
> is Sev returning triumphant.  Thus Severian has already suceeded before he
> begun!  Or has he?  Time travel always throws me through a logic loop.  Like
> asking the question "If I went back in time and killed my past self, who
> would grow up to kill me?"  Any thoughts?  This could be and endless
> discussion.
> 
> FunkMonkey
>     with the logical MonkeyWrench
> 
> J. Schutlz
> jschultz at wcnet.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.6 ---------------
> 
> From: m.driussi at genie.com
> Subject: (urth) Questions Keep Questing
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 98 04:11:00 GMT
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Adam,
> 
> FWIW I didn't take your post in a querulous mode.  And I'm glad that
> something I wrote seemed clear and enlightening, but of course I was
> only shooting in the dark and I can't hope to hit a homer every time,
> even if it is a room full of ancient Greek poets who are blind, just
> to mix metaphors (and this one is for raster--don't think I didn't
> laugh on that homer quip).
> 
> I'm comfortable with the paradoxes I hold in suspension on this one.
> If I can continue to explain what I see, maybe you can see it even if
> you don't particularly believe it.
> 
> The Peter Principle is about the triumph of mediocrity, I think.
> 
> Il Principe is Machiavelli's work about amoral statecraft.
> 
> Peter Wright's papers on the "Fictions of the New Sun" provide a
> Machiavellian reading (which, in turn, makes Severian's narrative
> much closer to Herbert's DUNE series than Tolkien's LOTR).
> 
> "Sirens of Titan" is another good touchstone and I'm glad you brought
> it up.  This is the "sarcastic" or "cosmic joke" answer to the Big
> Question, and I think we can all agree that it isn't an
> overwhelmingly fitting solution to the Briah/Yesod situation.
> 
> Some of your questions can be answered: The situation facing Severian
> rides a tightrope between free-will and pre-destination.
> 
> This by itself is a huge topic.  Philosophy, physics, metaphysics,
> etc.
> 
> In practical terms, we rejoice that Severian took the brown book,
> rather than Canog's Book of the New Sun, because this "opens the
> loop" and makes the oracular power of the tales work their magic on
> Severian, which then helps him behave in a certain way, which is then
> faithfully recorded as Canog's Book of the New Sun.  If Severian had
> taken Canog's, it would have been a closed loop "blueprint"; Severian
> would have been reduced to being a robot--and maybe would have
> resisted doing it, and the whole thing would collapse.
> 
> Likewise, nobody with any authority and/or knowledge could ever "tell
> Severian the truth" or "what to do" or anything like that.  For the
> same reason.  They tell him just enough and just in time.  He has to
> be guided to the right decision, but he cannot be simply told, nor
> forced to do something.
> 
> Maybe we could liken it to developing a photograph: it is done in the
> dark, by mysterious rituals and formula, but there is a goal in mind
> and it begins to materialize until finally it is done and we can turn
> on the light and see it clearly.
> 
> As for why does Yesod care.  Well, one model is that Briah and Yesod
> are two halves of the same creature--one is male and one is female,
> to use the crudest analogy.  They must have an exchange of
> information to ensure their own future survival: Urth gets a New Sun,
> and Yesod gets the next stage closer to Hieros . . . who will then
> make hierogrammates.  It all is a reproductive rite; as if homo
> sapiens were to guide australopithecus toward becoming homo erectus,
> so that homo erectus would give way to homo sapiens.
> 
> Which brings us to another dicotomy: the breaking of the human
> experience into Pure Order and the wild things.  Cyriaca's tale of
> posthistory tells us that the First Empire was founded upon the one
> (Order) and brought down by the rejected other (non-order).  The
> implication being (I think) that there should be a balance, within
> the individual and within the culture.
> 
> Not to be "zen" about it, nor too smug, but questions about the very
> mysterious first half of URTH should not be focused entirely in the
> "logical" or "rational" mode.  If Order leads to brick walls of
> confusion, see if Non-order can lead to a doorway.  If "modern
> science" can't answer, try "cave painting poetry" instead.
> 
> If you haven't already, you really should read Wright's essays.  You
> might find that they fit you like a tee.
> 
> =mantis=
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.7 ---------------
> 
> From: mary whalen <marewhalen at yahoo.com>
> Subject: (urth) David as Maitre 2
> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 23:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> This is Sean Whalen (prion).
> 
> I think that in _The Fifth Head of Cerberus_ the junior officer who
> reviews VRT's case is actually David.  First, David is known to have
> gone to the capital after his father's death, presumably to follow his
> love of political power.  Plenty of time has passed since the murder
> and VRT's arrest for him to have attained such a position and to have
> held it for a fairly significant amount of time.  Also, he is called a
> junior officer and the other officer he meets is called a brother
> officer.  This is an allusion to the fact that David is younger than
> his "brother" No. 5.  The other person the j.o. is mentioned in this
> story to be younger than is his slave, who is probably one of the
> clones or altered clones of Maitre.  This seems to be plenty, in a
> Wolfe book, to link him to David.  More, he is only addressed as
> Maitre, just like his father was, continuing the chain of linkage. 
> The other officer also says that he always was a night owl, which is
> similar to the way that David and No. 5 stayed up when they were young
> in FHC.  Also, when he hits the slave, it is like a reversal of when
> No. 5 accidently stabbed him when he was fighting the other clone of
> Maitre with four arms.
> 
> prion
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.8 ---------------
> 
> From: mary whalen <marewhalen at yahoo.com>
> Subject: (urth) Fifth Head miscellaney
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> This is Sean Whalen (prion).
> 
> I just wanted to put down a few minor miscellaneous points I have in
> my mind about _The Fifth Head of Cerberus_.
> 
> Today I saw a show about Neanderthals.  It seems that their
> flintworkers could make a blade that is the sharpest known to man, as
> could the later humans.  The discusser said that it is even sharper
> than a modern surgeon's scalpel.  Marsch talks about how flint can be
> chipped with little dexterity when he talks to RT speculating about
> how he could make the implements he sells as Annese with his arthritic
> hands.  VRT probably used flint to cut out the first pages of Marsch's
> diary, which are said in the story to have been cut out with an
> instrument sharper than a scalpel.
> 
> VRT may have bought the brass circumciser to use on himself, so that
> he would not be discovered to be impersonating Marsch if his books
> were found.  Did he ever get to use it?  I don't know if anyone in
> authority ever saw him naked, and he asked not to be strip-searched by
> the men who arrest him.
> 
> Isn't it possible that VRT didn't kill Marsch, but that he was killed
> by the tire-tiger?  In the journal, written by VRT, it says that
> Marsch was attacked by the waiting tiger when he came down from the
> tree, and that he should have been mauled but was absurdly lucky, and
> was only knocked back into a thorn bush.  It seems to me that the
> tiger actually killed Marsch, and that VRT wrote that Marsch survived
> so that he could take his place.  Otherwise, there's no reason to
> include this passage at all, as it seems ridiculous that Marsch could
> actually save himself if the tiger attacked as he came down the tree.
> 
> Again, I wonder if VRT actually killed the cat-girl or just wrote that
> so that he wouldn't have to write about her interactions with Marsch,
> which would have been very different from the interactions he had with
> her, and too difficult for him to make up.  When he begins to write in
> the journal, he also talks about "we" a lot, apparently about him and
> the mules, but perhaps not.
> 
> I don't think that I believe Robert Borski's idea that RT is actually
> an abo himself.  It seems odd that his wife and son have green eyes
> when he doesn't.  VRT thinks he's a human, he says that what happens
> to his hands will keep him from his profession, implying that he had
> tool-using hands before.  He can operate the buttons that his wife
> can't.
> 
> Also, I believe that there was some discussion about what VRT and
> Maitre believe about Jeannine's genetic relations when VRT says that
> she is the daughter of "shall we say an earlier 'version'" of No. 5. 
> It seems possible that he meant a version as the parent of the Gene
> Wolfe genome, rather than an earlier person in the line of clones. 
> However, in jail VRT says that Jeannine is genetically Gene's
> daughter.  At that time, remember, VRT didn't know that No. 5 knew he
> was a clone, and was thus just being subtle.
> 
> prion
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.9 ---------------
> 
> From: Peter Westlake <peter at harlequin.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Islands in Commonwealth
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 10:23:52 +0100
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> References: <199807022151.OAA05425 at lists1.best.com>
> In-Reply-To: <199807051857.LAA20487 at lists1.best.com>
> 
> At 13:57 1998-07-05 -0500, Adam wrote:

>> prion wrote:

>>> A previous letter to the list (I'm sorry but I don't remember when)
>>> asked how the Commonwealth could be in a South America geographically
>>> similar to the current continent when the Commonwealth is described as
>>> consisting of an archipelago of islands to the south.  The answer is
>>> that SA does have a long chain of many islands in the south, but it
>>> closely follows the close, so the questioner probably wouldn't
>>> remember them or have noticed them just by casually looking in the
>>> first place.

>> I was the original questioner, and I was aware of the islands in the
>> south of SA.  My question was based on my belief that Severian was
>> asserting that the Commonwealth consisted entirely of islands.  But
>> reexamining the quote, it now seems clear to me that the relevant
>> phrase--"a chain of islands like our south"--refers to the southern-
>> most portion of the Commonwealth, and not to the Commonwealth as a
>> whole, as I had originally thought.  So there's no problem there.

> Hasn't Wolfe said that Gyoll is the Orinoco? As usual, I can't find
> the place where I read this. But I looked at an atlas yesterday and
> was quite surprised. Because if it's true, then the islands in the
> South - the direction away from the Equator - would be the West Indies.
> Last year Scott Dalrymple wrote:

>> And, regarding Vodalus's assertion that Urth has flipped on her axis, would
>> that matter?  To someone like Severian, wouldn't the world appear to be the
>> same?  He'd still be traveling toward Urth's belly to reach the tropical
>> regions.  After all, North and South, while tied to poles, are somewhat
>> arbitrary constructs, aren't they?  Why couldn't we depict the world with
>> the South Pole on "top"?  Maybe we've got the whole universe upside-down.

> (I quote Scott because I can't find the original quote ;-)
> 
> It makes sense for the West Indies to be rather colder than nowadays,
> while the islands along the coast of South America would surely be
> under the ice. The West Indies are more of an archipelago, too.
> I think this also explains why the rivers all flow West, when we
> would expect them to flow East.
> 
> In _Citadel_ Severian is walking North with the sea to the West and
> the Sun rising on his right. The Sun still rises in the East, I think
> (doesn't Typhon's statue face West, away from the sunrise?) so this
> really would be the world having turned over, not a magnetic reversal.
> Mind you, this is about the one place in the whole book where left
> or right are mentioned explicitly. I would almost rather believe the
> Sun rose in the West than trust Severian to know which way was right,
> given his total inability to follow directions.
> 
> SBear.
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- MESSAGE urth.v017.n006.10 ---------------
> 
> From: mary whalen <marewhalen at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: (urth) Islands in Commonwealth
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 03:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> This is Sean Whalen (prion).
> 
> ---Peter Westlake wrote:

>> At 13:57 1998-07-05 -0500, Adam wrote:

>>> prion wrote:

>>>> A previous letter to the list (I'm sorry but I don't remember when)
>>>> asked how the Commonwealth could be in a South America
>>>> geographically
>>>> similar to the current continent when the Commonwealth is
>>>> described as
>>>> consisting of an archipelago of islands to the south.  The answer
>>>> is
>>>> that SA does have a long chain of many islands in the south, but it
>>>> closely follows the close, so the questioner probably wouldn't
>>>> remember them or have noticed them just by casually looking in the
>>>> first place.

>>> I was the original questioner, and I was aware of the islands in the
>>> south of SA.  My question was based on my belief that Severian was
>>> asserting that the Commonwealth consisted entirely of islands.  But
>>> reexamining the quote, it now seems clear to me that the relevant
>>> phrase--"a chain of islands like our south"--refers to the southern-
>>> most portion of the Commonwealth, and not to the Commonwealth as a
>>> whole, as I had originally thought.  So there's no problem there.

>> Hasn't Wolfe said that Gyoll is the Orinoco? As usual, I can't find
>> the place where I read this. But I looked at an atlas yesterday and
>> was quite surprised. Because if it's true, then the islands in the
>> South - the direction away from the Equator - would be the West
>> Indies.

> Wheww.  How's that for a bundle of citations?
> 
> I don't remember Wolfe ever saying this, and it doesn't appear
> possible (see below).

>> Last year Scott Dalrymple wrote:

>>> And, regarding Vodalus's assertion that Urth has flipped on her
>>> axis, would
>>> that matter?  To someone like Severian, wouldn't the world appear
>>> to be the
>>> same?  He'd still be traveling toward Urth's belly to reach the
>>> tropical
>>> regions.  After all, North and South, while tied to poles, are
>>> somewhat
>>> arbitrary constructs, aren't they?  Why couldn't we depict the
>>> world with
>>> the South Pole on "top"?  Maybe we've got the whole universe
>>> upside-down.

> Vodalus was talking about the magnetic axis flipping, which has
> happened often before on Earth.
> 
> North and south may seem arbitrary, but east and west definitely
> aren't.  The sun rises in the east and sets in the west.  Assuming a
> human has a head in one direction and feet in the other, it is
> possible to determine which side is left and which right, and they are
> different.  But anyway, with a person's left to the west and right to
> the east, he would be facing north, as happens to Severian (see below).

>> (I quote Scott because I can't find the original quote ;-)
>> 
>> It makes sense for the West Indies to be rather colder than nowadays,
>> while the islands along the coast of South America would surely be
>> under the ice. The West Indies are more of an archipelago, too.
>> I think this also explains why the rivers all flow West, when we
>> would expect them to flow East.
>> 
>> In _Citadel_ Severian is walking North with the sea to the West and
>> the Sun rising on his right. The Sun still rises in the East, I think
>> (doesn't Typhon's statue face West, away from the sunrise?) so this
>> really would be the world having turned over, not a magnetic reversal.
>> Mind you, this is about the one place in the whole book where left
>> or right are mentioned explicitly. I would almost rather believe the
>> Sun rose in the West than trust Severian to know which way was right,
>> given his total inability to follow directions.
>> 
>> SBear.

> As I understand it, the entire geography is like this: the sea level
> is lower because the colder temperature has frozen more water into the
> ice caps.  There is thus more land.  South America is in the general
> area it is now, with a similar distribution of continents.  Nessus is
> on the west coast, west of the "Andes" and perhaps on land that is
> currently underwater.  The Gyoll flows from it's source in the Andes
> west to it's mouth on the west coast.  East of the Andes is the Amazon
> jungle.  North in North America is the country of the Ascians.  West
> are the Xanthic lands (Asia).
> 
> To explain:  in the book it says that to the south are the narrow
> lands and the southern archipelago.  This could refer to either what
> is currently north or south, however, it also says that to the north
> is the waist of the world and north of that the Ascians.  There is no
> isthmus to what we call the south.  Therefore, the directions are the
> same as we use today.  The Ascians live in North America, the waist is
> the Isthmus of Panama and environs.  The narrow lands are the narrow
> southern part of South America.  Also, the islands may not be the ones
> there today, but lower ones revealed by the receded ocean.  Severian
> also says that the north is hotter, in some sections of the books.
> 
> The rivers flow west because he's west of the Andes.  There's also
> more land in that area because of the sea level.
> 
> I've already discussed how Severian's northward journey helps confirm
> this.
> 
> prion
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> 
> --------------- END urth.v017.n006 ---------------

---
