# Sudden silence

*The Urth list — 5 messages, 4 voices, 19 Aug 1998*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1050>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Matthew Malthouse
*19 Aug 1998, 22:55*

Has traffic on the list really sunk to near nothing, or should I be looking
for problems in my mail systems?

Matthew

---

### m.driussi
*20 Aug 1998, 00:15 · follows Matthew Malthouse*

Matthew,

Yep, traffic on the list really has sunk to near nothing.

=mantis=

---

### Matthew Malthouse
*20 Aug 1998, 01:27 · follows m.driussi*

> m.driussi at genie.com wrote:
> 
> Matthew,
> 
> Yep, traffic on the list really has sunk to near nothing.

Ho ho. S'pose I could read em again, see if I can find something to post about
('though the depth and erudition of the analysis here is somewhat intimidating
when I'm in a less than secure frame of mind :) )

Matthew

---

### Jack Lyons
*20 Aug 1998, 06:13 · follows Matthew Malthouse*

On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Matthew Malthouse wrote:

:m.driussi at genie.com wrote:
:> 
:> Matthew,
:> 
:> Yep, traffic on the list really has sunk to near nothing.
:
:
:Ho ho. S'pose I could read em again, see if I can find
:something to post about ('though the depth and erudition of
:the analysis here is somewhat intimidating when I'm in a
:less than secure frame of mind :) ) 

Has anyone examined the metaphorical significance of the
Trinity in the Kabbalistic interpretations of the letters in
Wolfe's name? I don't think we've done that yet. 

---

### Derek Bell
*20 Aug 1998, 17:04 · follows Jack Lyons*

In message <199808201015.DAA24004 at lists1.best.com>, Jack Lyons writes:

> Has anyone examined the metaphorical significance of the
> Trinity in the Kabbalistic interpretations of the letters in
> Wolfe's name? I don't think we've done that yet. 

	Derridadaism, anyone? ;-)

	Derek

---