{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1054",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 1054,
    "subject": "Peace: non ho capito",
    "messages": 4,
    "voices": 3,
    "first": "1998-08-23T05:37:13+00:00",
    "last": "1998-08-24T01:35:13+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0018-0016@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "CRCulver",
        "address": "crculver at aol.com"
      },
      "date": "1998-08-23T05:37:13+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Peace: non ho capito",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Friends,\n\nI've just recently returned to my home from a vacation to the southern states.\nWhile there, I read _Peace,_ and I have no idea what it was about. Is Alden\nDennis Weer a time traveller? Is he dead? Who is the woman who some readers\nthink he killed?\n\nAbout the only thing I did understand about _Peace_ are the many references to\nand borrowings from Jorge Luis Borges.\n\nAny help on understanding this difficult tome would be appreciated!\n\nChristopher R. Culver <crculver at aol.com>\nhttp://members.aol.com/crculver/index.html\n------------------------------------------------\n\"The darkest dreams are the ones that come true.\"\n-Warren Defever"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0018-0017@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Jason Voegele",
        "address": "voegele.6 at osu.edu"
      },
      "date": "1998-08-23T08:29:50+00:00",
      "subject": "Re: (urth) Peace: non ho capito",
      "in_reply_to": "<urth-v0018-0016@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Whoa there!  That's a BIG can of worms.  We had quite a good discussion of\nPEACE early on in the list, so you should be able to get some good info from\nthe archives.\n\nFor starters, it does appear the Weer is dead from the outset of the\nbook--many have noted that the falling tree disturbs his grave.  On other\ntheme in the book that I'm fond of (though I've had little luck convincing\nanyone of this) is solipsism.  Weer's universe seems to exist solely in his\nthoughts, but his relating of the stories of the dead breathes new life into\nthose old bones.  Also note the \"Rest in PEACE\" theme, in that by telling\nthe stories of the dead, their souls may finally R.I.P.\n\nSee Clute for a good discussion of this work.  Also, someone on this list\n(was that you, Damien?) has written an excellent essay on PEACE, which can\nbe located in the archives.\n\nJason Voegele\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: CRCulver at aol.com <CRCulver at aol.com>\nTo: urth at lists.best.com <urth at lists.best.com>\nDate: Sunday, August 23, 1998 1:45 AM\nSubject: (urth) Peace: non ho capito\n\n\n|Friends,\n|\n|I've just recently returned to my home from a vacation to the southern\nstates.\n|While there, I read _Peace,_ and I have no idea what it was about. Is Alden\n|Dennis Weer a time traveller? Is he dead? Who is the woman who some readers\n|think he killed?\n|\n|About the only thing I did understand about _Peace_ are the many references\nto\n|and borrowings from Jorge Luis Borges.\n|\n|Any help on understanding this difficult tome would be appreciated!\n|\n|Christopher R. Culver <crculver at aol.com>\n|http://members.aol.com/crculver/index.html\n|------------------------------------------------\n|\"The darkest dreams are the ones that come true.\"\n|-Warren Defever\n|\nworks"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0018-0019@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "William H. Ansley",
        "address": "wansley at warwick.net"
      },
      "date": "1998-08-24T00:15:43+00:00",
      "subject": "Re: (urth) Peace: non ho capito",
      "in_reply_to": "<urth-v0018-0017@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "We had quite a good discussion of\nPEACE early on in the list, so you should be able to get some good info from\nthe archives."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "I am not sure if I am thinking of the same discussion of _Peace_ that you\nare (although I remember only one) but if I am then \"good\" is perhaps\noverstating it. What I remember is a lengthy discussion (which I started)\nabout what Weer knew about Napolean's hand. It reached no definitive\nconclusion.\n\nNo wait, that's wrong. I am just remembering that there was also a\ndiscussion about whether Weer killed everybody else in _Peace_, long before\nI joined the list.\n\nI just looked it up. The original _Peace_ discussion was in the Urth Mail\nArchive Volume 1. The \"Napolean's Hand\" discussion, which also has its\npoints of interest was split over Volumes 10 and 11.\n\nHere is a long interview with Wolfe that includes info on _Peace_:\n<http://world.std.com/~pduggan/gwjbj.html>. I got the URL from this Wolfe\npage (check it out for many other good Wolfe links including more\ninterviews) <http://world.std.com/~pduggan/wolfe.html> which I got from the\nWhorl web page <http://www.moonmilk.com/whorl/>.\n\nWilliam Ansley"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0018-0023@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Jason Voegele",
        "address": "voegele.6 at osu.edu"
      },
      "date": "1998-08-24T01:35:13+00:00",
      "subject": "Re: (urth) Peace: non ho capito",
      "in_reply_to": "<urth-v0018-0019@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "|I am not sure if I am thinking of the same discussion of _Peace_ that you\n|are (although I remember only one) but if I am then \"good\" is perhaps\n|overstating it. What I remember is a lengthy discussion (which I started)\n|about what Weer knew about Napolean's hand. It reached no definitive\n|conclusion.\n|\n|No wait, that's wrong. I am just remembering that there was also a\n|discussion about whether Weer killed everybody else in _Peace_, long before\n|I joined the list.\n\n\nYes, this is the one to which I was referring.  OK, maybe \"good\" was\noverstating it some, since we barely scratched the surface, but there were\nmultiple posts covering multiple subjects, so at least a good start to a\ngood discussion has been set in place.\n\n|I just looked it up. The original _Peace_ discussion was in the Urth Mail\n|Archive Volume 1. The \"Napolean's Hand\" discussion, which also has its\n|points of interest was split over Volumes 10 and 11."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}