Lafferty
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 16 Feb 1999
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1372

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Alex David Groce — 16 Feb 1999, 12:19

	I would imagine that the lack of Lafferty discussion is due to the fact
that although Wolfe and Lafferty share similar worldviews and Wolfe is a great
admirer of Lafferty's works, they don't have similar styles.  I would suspect
that there are other Lafferty fans on the list, though.  I certainly love
Lafferty's work.  Actually, another point would be that Lafferty's work is
generally less open to the kind of minute "hunt for clues" that Wolfe invites.
 Lafferty seems to be a gestalt--you get it or you don't, and a search for
hidden symbolisms or recursive structures is unproductive.

  --
  "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." - John 8:32
  --
  Alex David Groce (adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu)
  Senior (Computer Science/Multidisciplinary Studies in Technology & Fiction)
  '98-99 NCSU AITP Student Chapter President
  608 Charleston Road, Apt. 1E (919)-233-7366
  http://www4.ncsu.edu/~adgroce

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roy C. Lackey — 17 Feb 1999, 05:05
  follows, by subject match Alex David Groce

> "Alex David Groce" <adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu>
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 12:19:19 -0500 wrote:
>  I would imagine that the lack of Lafferty discussion is due to the fact
> that although Wolfe and Lafferty share similar worldviews and Wolfe is a
> great

admirer of Lafferty's works, they don't have similar styles.  I would
suspect
that there are other Lafferty fans on the list, though.  I certainly love
Lafferty's work.  Actually, another point would be that Lafferty's work is
generally less open to the kind of minute "hunt for clues" that Wolfe
invites.
Lafferty seems to be a gestalt--you get it or you don't, and a search for
hidden symbolisms or recursive structures is unproductive. <

    I too like Lafferty, but all too often often I don't "get it". Sometimes
I'm not so sure what there is to get, which may be related to why most of
his later work only saw print from obscure presses. Last spring mantis was
wondering where else in fiction he had read about the "fake" Venus de Milo.
It rang a bell. I thought it was from the Master Forger bits in _Where Have
You Been, Sandaliotis?_, but I couldn't find it there. Oh, well. Thanks for
the input.

Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------