{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1519",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 1519,
    "subject": "The Roy Trenchard argument again",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "1999-04-12T12:52:28+00:00",
    "last": "1999-04-12T12:52:28+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0025-0053@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Tony Ellis",
        "address": "tony.ellis at futurenet.co.uk"
      },
      "date": "1999-04-12T12:52:28+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) The Roy Trenchard argument again",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "Mitchell A. Bailey wrote:\nOn the other hand, Robert Borski has made a pretty solid case that not\nonly is Vic's vanished mother of the  Free People of the hills, but Roy\nTrenchard is actually an abo also, specifically of the marshmen,\ntherefore no Terran/Annese crossbreeding is necessary (leave that kind\nof scenario for Star Trek). Check out the essay entitled \"Roy Trenchard,\nHomeboy\". If it's not in the Urth archives, it's on RB's Cave Canem\nwebsite."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "At the risk of annoying two people at the same time with my obtuseness, Robert Borski\nhas -not- made a solid case that Roy Trenchard is also an abo! There are a dozen\ndifferent fingerposts pointing to Trenchard's humanity, and simply re-writing Fifth\nHead to one's own satisfaction is no way of getting rid of any of them. Check out my\nobjections to Robert's arguments in my posts of the 4th and 5th of June 1998, archive\nvol. 13."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}