{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1568",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 1568,
    "subject": "Digest urth.v026.n001",
    "messages": 2,
    "voices": 2,
    "first": "1999-04-23T08:54:00+00:00",
    "last": "1999-04-23T10:14:05+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0026-0011@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Alice Turner",
        "address": "akt at ibm.net"
      },
      "date": "1999-04-23T08:54:00+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Re: Digest urth.v026.n001",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "--------------- MESSAGE urth.v026.n001.9 ---------------\n\nFrom: \"Ori Kowarsky\" <orik at sprint.ca>\nChristoper R. Culver wrote:\n\n\"I think that the \"judge\" version of Tzadkiel, analogous to the Archangel\nMichael, would be certainly be divine. Whether of not he receives\ncommunication directly from the Pancreator is one of the more interesting\nmysteries of _Urth_.\"\n\nI do not blieve that Tzad is remotely connected to the Archangel Michael,\nin\neither motive or substance.  If he comes off like an angel on the Day of\nJugement this is a carefully orchestated effect, done for the benefit of\nSev\nand his personal, shall we say, demons."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Now wait a sec here. Tzadkiel is not Michael but s/he certainly is an angel,\nnot an archangel like Michael, but a sufficiently great and important being\nfor Urth/Ushas. S/he is the Angel of Divine Justice. (My info comes from\nGustav Davidson's -A Dictionary of Angels-, Free Press 1967, which is not\none of those idiotic gift-books of angels, but a scholarly work). I don't\nhave the book to hand, so cannot tell you more, but I do have a xerox of the\nlist of the 30 top angels (and the 103 fallen angels).\n\n-alga"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0026-0013@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Jack Lyons",
        "address": "revjack at radix.net"
      },
      "date": "1999-04-23T10:14:05+00:00",
      "subject": "Re: (urth) Re: Digest urth.v026.n001",
      "in_reply_to": "<urth-v0026-0011@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Alice Turner wrote:\n\n:Now wait a sec here. Tzadkiel is not Michael but s/he\n:certainly is an angel, not an archangel like Michael, but a\n:sufficiently great and important being for Urth/Ushas.\n\nAngels are supernatural beings. Tzadkeiel (acknowledging\nthat this is fiction) is not a supernatural being.\n\n:(My info comes from Gustav Davidson's -A Dictionary of\n:Angels-, Free Press 1967, which is not one of those idiotic\n:gift-books of angels, but a scholarly work). \n\nA scholarly work on supernatural beings?\n\nI contend that F. Murray Abraham is an angel."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}