# Typology, etc. *The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 29 Apr 1999* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### Alex David Groce *29 Apr 1999, 12:56* Nigel Price's statements seems to be dead-on-target. Jonathan Laidlow's elaborated presentation of Wolfe's modernism also rings mostly true. Wolfe isn't writing a 19th century novel (although the text does, in fact, as Wolfe intends, pull us into an imagined world). So, arguing about what the furniture is made of may be pointless at times--but arguments about the metaphysics of the fictional reality, and in particular the theology and "economy of divinity" is crucial to understanding the text. A purely materialistic "interpretation" seems to both violate the realistic narrative and the metafictional use of story--it tries to "untell" what seems to be the central story. If ULYSSES is a "re-telling" of Homer's Odyssey in any sense that matters, surely BOTNS is a kind of "re-telling" of, well, the Bible (with an emphasis on the New Testament). To "untell" these central stories is to distort their embodying works. ``` "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." - John 8:32 -- Alex David Groce (adgroce at eos.ncsu.edu) Senior (Computer Science/Multidisciplinary Studies in Technology & Fiction) '98-99 NCSU AITP Student Chapter President 608 Charleston Road, Apt. 1E (919)-233-7366 http://www4.ncsu.edu/~adgroce ``` ---