# de Sade, Plato, and Jack the Ripper.....

*The Urth list — 4 messages, 4 voices, 22 Jul 1999*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1720>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Jonathan Laidlow
*22 Jul 1999, 11:43*

'With its references to DeSade, Plato and Jack the Ripper, this  is a 
fully realized culture, utterly strange and utterly believeable, as 
might be expected from the author of 'The Fifth Head of Cerberus''
- - Algys Budrys, review of 'Shadow of the Torturer', The Magazine of 
Fantasy and Science Fiction vol.58 no. 5 May 1980.

As I became bored of de Sade (!), am ignorant of Plato, and just 
plain confused by Ripperology, where are these references? Wouldn't 
it be fun if we teased them out?

Jonathan
Visit Ultan's Library - A Gene Wolfe web resource
http://members.tripod.co.uk/laidlow/index.htm
Jonathan Laidlow
University of Birmingham, UK

---

### Peter Stephenson
*22 Jul 1999, 11:49 · follows Jonathan Laidlow*

> "Jonathan Laidlow" wrote:
> 'With its references to DeSade, Plato and Jack the Ripper, this  is a 
> fully realized culture, utterly strange and utterly believeable, as 
> might be expected from the author of 'The Fifth Head of Cerberus''
> - - Algys Budrys, review of 'Shadow of the Torturer', The Magazine of 
> Fantasy and Science Fiction vol.58 no. 5 May 1980.
> 
> As I became bored of de Sade (!), am ignorant of Plato, and just 
> plain confused by Ripperology, where are these references? Wouldn't 
> it be fun if we teased them out?

Yes, it would, although maybe he's just saying Wolfe refers to anything and
everything and has picked some extreme examples, like Polonius ends his
list of things the players in Hamlet can perform with `scene individable
and poem unlimited', whatever that means.  But it's fun to make dodgy
hypotheses based on tenuous connections.

Plato, I suppose, means the ideal republic of the Republic, with its
philosopher ruler, which isn't so far off what the autarch is (in practice,
I mean, when we actually meet him --- pedants will want to wreck this by
noting that we don't in Shadow, apart from an appearance in the House Azure
which isn't explained till later).  You could probably make an argument
that the New Sun was the Form of the Good, but that would be a bit vague
even for my taste.  Nor does it seem particularly outr'e to suggest the
Commonwealth is less than ideal.  Was he thinking of cave dwellers, looking
at the world in shadow?  Or (I may well be doing Budrys a disservice) does
Plato mean `some Greek guy with old-fashioned ideas about society'?

As for the others --- neither aristocratic debauchery and perversion, nor
the systematic murder of prostitutes are major themes in Wolfe, although I
hesitate in case anyone has a piece of fan fiction ready.  Here's my guess:
both de Sade and Jack the Ripper are generic references to a decadent (in
Wolfe's case `decayed' would seem more appropriate) world of aristocratic
(i.e. exultant) vice --- we already know in `Shadow', for example, that
Thecla and her relatives are concubines.

There was a 1979 film, `Murder by Decree', in which Jack the Ripper turned
out to be the Duke of Clarence, mad son of Victoria and Albert (there, I've
spoilt it for you, sorry); the case was investigated by Sherlock Holmes
(Christopher Plummer) and Dr Watson (James Mason).  They managed to cram
the freemasons, and even werewolves if the quote below is anything to go by
(though I can't remember that bit), into the story, too.  `Oliver Stone
would love this plot' is a comment in the IMDB review (see
http://us.imdb.com/Title?0079592).  Coming a year or so before Shadow of
the Torturer, with a strange city (they always do that to Victorian London,
but I suppose Dickens got there first), and a proto-Wolfean mixing of
themes, it might have been enough to suggest to Budrys that `Shadow' had
Jack-the-Ripper connotations.

  Holmes: We've unmasked madmen, Watson, wielding sceptres. Reason run
                 riot. Justice howling at the moon.

corncrake

---

### Alex Groce
*22 Jul 1999, 12:45 · follows Peter Stephenson*

> On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Yes, it would, although maybe he's just saying Wolfe refers to anything and
> everything and has picked some extreme examples, like Polonius ends his
> list of things the players in Hamlet can perform with `scene individable
> and poem unlimited', whatever that means.  But it's fun to make dodgy
> hypotheses based on tenuous connections.
> 
> Plato, I suppose, means the ideal republic of the Republic, with its
> philosopher ruler, which isn't so far off what the autarch is (in practice,
> I mean, when we actually meet him --- pedants will want to wreck this by
> noting that we don't in Shadow, apart from an appearance in the House Azure
> which isn't explained till later).  You could probably make an argument
> that the New Sun was the Form of the Good, but that would be a bit vague
> even for my taste.  Nor does it seem particularly outr'e to suggest the
> Commonwealth is less than ideal.  Was he thinking of cave dwellers, looking
> at the world in shadow?  Or (I may well be doing Budrys a disservice) does
> Plato mean `some Greek guy with old-fashioned ideas about society'?

        I think Plato is definitely the easy one of these to find.  My
guess would be Severian's "We believe that we invent symbols"
passage--which I showed a friend as an example of Wolfe's writing, and he
said "Nice writing, but it's just Plato's old stuff about Ideals."  Maybe
not exactly, but certainly related.

        Jack the Ripper and de Sade somehow seem more likely to be 5HC
elements than in Shadow. . .  Urth is more Byzantine decadent than
Victorian London/Justine decadent.    

"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." John 8:32

```
Alex David Groce (agroce at cs.cmu.edu)
Ph.D. Student, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~agroce
```

---

### Michael Andre-Driussi
*22 Jul 1999, 13:13 · follows Alex Groce*

Re: the Budrys line in review of THE SHADOW OF THE TORTURER.

> Alex Groce wrote:
>        I think Plato is definitely the easy one of these to find.  My
> guess would be Severian's "We believe that we invent symbols"
> passage--which I showed a friend as an example of Wolfe's writing, and he
> said "Nice writing, but it's just Plato's old stuff about Ideals."  Maybe
> not exactly, but certainly related.

I'd agree with that.  Add details like Thecla's mention of "agathodaemon."
Perhaps all the Hellenic/Hellenistic terms, even the names of weapons, add
to a "Greek-ness" which then led Budrys to "Plato."

For traces of de Sade, I'd say offhand: "Algedonic" and any issues of
algophilia among the torturers, as discussed by Severian (although I'm not
sure how much of this is done in SHADOW itself).

For traces of Jack the Ripper, I'd guess: issues of beating prostitutes,
which comes up first in the cab ride and later at the brothel itself (of
course, this has de Sadean applications as well).  Maybe the casual mention
of the murdered body near the cafe, even though this seems to be more the
victim of a thugee attack than that of a knifeman.  Maybe the serial
killings perpetrated by the evil twins.  Maybe even the hallucinatory
talking skull trick (that Agilus uses in the shop) seems like the visions
of or by a ripper?

Since Budrys was only writing a brief review, it is probably nothing more
than a few details such as these, which stuck in his mind as possible hooks
for other readers.

=mantis=

---
