Robinson on Wolfe

The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 17 Sep 1999
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1787

Nicholas Gevers17 Sep 1999, 13:02original
Recently, while conducting an interview with Kim Stanley Robinson, I asked him his opinion concerning Gene Wolfe's contribution to SF. This was his response: KSR: Well it would be hard to particularize, he has contributed so much. In short, greatness. He is similar to the great modernist masters of the first half of the century, people like Stevens or Proust or Woolf, in that he has a very powerful personal vision, and great moral complexity and intensity, expressed in beautiful prose and surreal imagery, in many superb stories and novels. We in the sf community can point to his work as evidence that science fiction is capable of achieving all that modernism ever hoped for literature, and then some, in that he plots better than most of the modernists. As for specifically science fictional contributions, the working knowledge of technology and society given to him by his editing job at PLANT ENGINEERING allowed him to be sophisticated and authoritative when he introduced scientific elements into his work. At the same time there is a dreamlike quality to much of his writing, in its boldness and strangeness, and seeming inevitability. This combination of gifts allowed him the greatest achievement in science fantasy, in his Sun masterpieces. ===
Fr.Inire17 Sep 1999, 20:17original

↳ follows, by subject match Nicholas Gevers

geez, you'd think he would have at least said something NICE...;-> I try to explain my version of KSR's proclamation, but it doesn't seem to sawy many votes...<sigh>. P'Raps I should send the above around and see if THAT moves any mountains! === Jeff "My dice hate me!" Miller The HeavyGear Parts SwapMeet is at http://freecenter.digiweb.com/games/severian/swap.html Heavy Gear: Not your Dad's walking robot game...www.dp9.com Gaming to keep War out of RealTime! '82 GS650G

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.