{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1839",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 1839,
    "subject": "DROTTE VS. ROCHE",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "1999-10-18T08:50:48+00:00",
    "last": "1999-10-18T08:50:48+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0028-0209@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Bill Carmichael",
        "address": "bcarmichael1 at home.com"
      },
      "date": "1999-10-18T08:50:48+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) DROTTE VS. ROCHE",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Hello, all -\n\tFormer lurker here, and I have a question that's been bugging me for about fifteen years, now.  On the very first page of SOTT, Severian says:\n\t\"I would have hidden, but Roche held me, saying, 'Wait, I see pikes'\".\nAnd then, just a few paragraphs later:\n\t\"...but they had pikes, as Drotte had said,...\"\n\nMy question is, what's going on here? Who actually commented on the peasants being armed? \n\nMy apologies if this particular bit of apparent narrative contradiction has been discussed and dispensed with previously, but does anybody have any insight into why this error appears in the text? I believe the error to be intentional, because it shows up both in my old beat-to-hell paperpack copy, and in my nice new trade pb copy.  And also because I've come to expect that Wolfe has a reason for just about everything in the bood.  I'm not sure exactly how to evaluate it.  Is this just Wolfe's first signal to us that Severian isn't a perfectly reliable narrator, claims to perfect recall not withstanding?\n\nAnd what exactly would be the implications of Severian being an unreliable narrator, anyhow?\n\nInterested in hearing everybody's thoughts.\n\nIpsifendus"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}