Clute, STRANGE TRAVELERS, and Hartwell the Hierogrammate
The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 06 Nov 1999
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/1932

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Nicholas Gevers — 06 Nov 1999, 21:40

Various points raised by Kevin Maroney and alga:

1) On Clute: it's true that Clute's contortions of
style can hinder accessibility of his mass-audience
reviews for that audience; but I think this misses the
point of why SF WEEKLY, Dorling Kindersley, and others
similarly commercial have employed Clute to produce
material for them. It's because of his style, which,
for whatever reasons, has won him a wider popularity.
Maybe his critical poetry strikes chords in unexpected
places; but he is very widely read, and not because he
dumbs down his prose.

2) The contents of STRANGE TRAVELERS: disappointing. I
had really hoped for a volume including "Empires of
Foliage and Flower", "The Night Chough", "Houston,
1943", and various other major late stories. Is a
further collection in prospect? I hope so.

3) David Hartwell's role in persuading GW to produce
UOTNS: as he is Wolfe's long-time editor, couldn't we
see Hartwell as a sort of Hierogrammate, patiently
recording the rescripts of the Increate? And sometimes
prompting them?


=====

------------------------------------------------------------------------------