{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2193",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 2193,
    "subject": "Digest urth.v028.n181",
    "messages": 2,
    "voices": 2,
    "first": "2000-04-16T19:46:03+00:00",
    "last": "2000-04-17T10:31:28+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0028-0903@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Richard Horton",
        "address": "rrhorton at prodigy.net"
      },
      "date": "2000-04-16T19:46:03+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Re: Digest urth.v028.n181",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 06:10:41 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:\nEven fewer people know there is no such book as \"RevelationS\". :-) It's\nthe Revelation of St. John, or the Apocalypse of St. John, or Revelation,\nor Apocalypse, or The Revelation of Jesus Christ."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Attributing it to \"St. John\" is controversial as well, as contemporary\nscholarship seems to agree that John of Patmos, the author of\nRevelation, is not the apostle John."
        },
        {
          "kind": "sig",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "-- \nRich Horton | Stable Email: mailto://richard.horton at sff.net\nHome Page: http://www.sff.net/people/richard.horton\nAlso visit SF Site (http://www.sfsite.com) and Tangent Online (http://www.sfsite.com/tangent)"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0028-0907@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Michael Straight",
        "address": "straight at email.unc.edu"
      },
      "date": "2000-04-17T10:31:28+00:00",
      "subject": "Re: (urth) Re: Digest urth.v028.n181",
      "in_reply_to": "<urth-v0028-0903@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Sun, 16 Apr 2000, Richard Horton wrote:\nOn Wed, 12 Apr 2000 06:10:41 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 2,
          "text": "Even fewer people know there is no such book as \"RevelationS\". :-) It's\nthe Revelation of St. John, or the Apocalypse of St. John, or Revelation,\nor Apocalypse, or The Revelation of Jesus Christ."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "Attributing it to \"St. John\" is controversial as well, as contemporary\nscholarship seems to agree that John of Patmos, the author of\nRevelation, is not the apostle John."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "I don't think \"contemporary scholarship\" is that monolithic.  A lot of\nthose authorship debates seem to me to be based on too little evidence.\nSome of the arguments I've seen for that position could be used to prove\nthat the Gene Wolfe who wrote the New Sun books is not the same person who\nwrote the Long Sun books (significant stylistic differences, a large chunk\nof vocabulary unique to one series or the other, different tehological\nideas and concerns, etc.)\n\n-Rostrum"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}