# Crowley Discussion

*The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 03 May 2000*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2230>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Nil_Ultra
*03 May 2000, 11:04*

Has anyone considered forming a John Crowley forum?  Judging by the degree
of discussion here,  I would say that there is certainly interest.  I enjoy
hearing about other good authors in this forum,  but the Crowley discussion
has gone to the point of precluding discussion of Wolfe.  Seeing all the
interest in Crowley I have ordered the bok and am interested in reading it,
but I am more interested in Gene Wolfe dicussion here than a general
discussion of excellent authors.

---

### Michael Straight
*03 May 2000, 15:55 · follows Nil_Ultra*

I think if you give it another week or so it'll die down and we'll be back
to Wolfe again.  

-Rostrum

> On Wed, 3 May 2000, Nil_Ultra wrote:
> Has anyone considered forming a John Crowley forum?  Judging by the degree
> of discussion here,  I would say that there is certainly interest.  I enjoy
> hearing about other good authors in this forum,  but the Crowley discussion
> has gone to the point of precluding discussion of Wolfe.  Seeing all the
> interest in Crowley I have ordered the bok and am interested in reading it,
> but I am more interested in Gene Wolfe dicussion here than a general
> discussion of excellent authors.

---