Little, Big: 52; Eigenblick
The Urth list — 3 messages, 2 voices, 08 May 2000
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2245

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Adam Stephanides — 08 May 2000, 09:32

> alga wrote:
> Can someone supply page (or chapter) numbers for 52 fairies, 52
> Drinkwater kin and 52 cards? Thanks.

I can only cite page numbers for the original 1981 Bantam trade
paperback.  But I'll do that, along with chapters. 52 cards: "The Least
Trumps," II, 3, p. 156; confirmed in "Fifty-Two," VI, 1, pp. 432-33.  52
fairies: "A Parliament" VI, 2, p. 459.

The other 52 does not, strictly speaking, refer to the Drinkwater kin,
but to the guests at the wedding party/wake.  This doesn't include
Grandfather Trout, and it does include Eigenblick; it's not clear
whether it includes Fred or Alice.  And it's not stated explicitly, or
even implied conclusively: Sophie tries to count the guests, but fails,
and then thinks "anyway she didn't need to count in order to know how
many were here."  ("She's Here, She's Near," VI, 5, p. 536.)  Given the
importance of the number 52, this probably means that there are 52
guests (or at least Sophie thinks there are), but you could put another
construction on it.

There's another 52 too, which hasn't been mentioned so far: 52 henchmen
of Russell Eigenblick transformed into playing cards ("Fifty-two
Pickup," VI, 4, p. 510).  This number doesn't include Eigenblick
himself, who is turned into the Fool.

Speaking of Eigenblick, a long time ago (well, it seems that way) alga
asked if somebody could justify the presence of the Eigenblick subplot. 
It's not my favorite part of the book either, and Eigenblick's speech is
the one passage in the book which rings false to me.  Still, the subplot
does have the function of showing just how ruthless the fairies are.  As
for any other functions, this is the best I can come up with: when we
first hear of Eigenblick, he seems to be the activist counterpart of the
Drinkwaters, fighting against the Noisy Bridge Rod and Gun Club to
re-enchant the world.  But Eigenblick proves to be an insane tyrant who
brings disaster to the whole nation (except the Drinkwaters).  The moral
is either that politics is no good (a very seventies conclusion); or
that any sort of action to bring the fairies closer is wrong, and the
only acceptable course is to wait passively like the Drinkwaters do
(somewhat like the "negative Taoism" mantis found in GWoT); or that
longing for enchantment is wrong in itself (as Nutria would argue).  You
pays your money and you takes your choice.  I think the first two are
definitely there, and possibly intimations of the third as well.

--Adam

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim Jordan — 10 May 2000, 16:20
  follows, by subject match Adam Stephanides

> At 09:32 AM 5/8/00 -0700, you wrote:
> 
> There's another 52 too, which hasn't been mentioned so far: 52 henchmen
> of Russell Eigenblick transformed into playing cards ("Fifty-two
> Pickup," VI, 4, p. 510).  This number doesn't include Eigenblick
> himself, who is turned into the Fool.

	In any pantheistic construction of reality, you have yin and yang,
positive and negative, good and evil -- somehow. Maybe there are "two"
decks of 52 cards, one positive and one negative. Fairies and anti-fairies.
Demons and gods. Those moving out of the Christian/Humanist world move both
ways or either way. Make sense?
	In which case, the "war" is not merely the red-herring I originally
thought. The negative 52 are "winter" and the positive 52 are "summer." And
they are involved in an eternal "war." 
	As to the "cyclical" business: I submit that it will depend on a closer
description of what is actually cyclical. The allusions to the passage of
the seasons implies a cycle. The people of "our" world wind up with a
legend that someday Eigenblick will return. That implies to me that this
Tale will recur, and that Daily Alice & Co. will in time recruit new
future-fairies to replace them, and will move farther "within." 

Nutricious

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Stephanides — 12 May 2000, 09:16
  follows, by subject match Jim Jordan

> Nutria wrote:
> 
> Maybe there are "two"
> decks of 52 cards, one positive and one negative. Fairies and anti-fairies.
> Demons and gods. Those moving out of the Christian/Humanist world move both
> ways or either way. Make sense?
>         In which case, the "war" is not merely the red-herring I originally
> thought. The negative 52 are "winter" and the positive 52 are "summer." And
> they are involved in an eternal "war."

Making Eigenblick's henchmen the positive deck?  But Eigenblick regards
himself as an ally of the fairies, though they cheat him in the end. 
And Eigenblick and the fairies collaborate to bring about "winter."

> The people of "our" world wind up with a
> legend that someday Eigenblick will return.

But as Ariel points out, there have been many legends of dead leaders
someday returning; most are not true.  Moreover, Barbarossa [Eigenblick]
really had been put to sleep for a thousand years, having been "stored
up" by the fairies so that he could return.  But Eigenblick is ensconced
as king in the fairy country, and (at least as I see it) unlikely to
return.

--Adam

------------------------------------------------------------------------------