Digest urth.v005.n035
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 23 Oct 1997
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/232
John,
Actually, I place Nashwonk as a moose rather than an elk, but a moose is a kind of elk, so either would be ok. But a buffalo can't cut it. Read the description of the fight with the chair, then mantis's clever gloss on how the points of the chair correspond to the points of the antlers. A buffalo, even the beloved sambhur, doesn't have that kind of equipment.
An African lion is what you're thinking of, and indeed he has the mane that Ketin enjoys. But there is a tawny mountain lion with a big shaggy head in the northwestern New World too, who stands in very well for Mr. and Mrs. Ketin. And the description of Mimmunka is, to my mind, clearly that of a lynx or bobcat; a leopard would be described quite differently (and would have spots!) What's more, dog was just a first guess for Cim; she is a mink, as the actual quotation from Wolfe (it's back there in the archive somewhere) and her own erratic behavior make clear.
The Min as monkeys is certainly a new idea---but not one that I take to.
-alga-
↳ follows, by subject match Alice Turner
Fellow Wolfians:
Please don't post stuff twice, especially if the
second posting is HTML-source. It's ugly and takes
up space. Ditto for long quotes, especially quotes
of the boilerplate at the end of the digest.
Digest n035 had a couple of examples. It seems that
"Jason Voegele" <voegele.6 at osu.edu> has a mailer
that does this automatically.
Thanks!
On another matter, Cim Glowing says she is named after
the "cim glowing on the trees" (approximate quote).
I can't find "cim" in the local big dictionary. Any
ideas what it is? Wolfe doesn't usually make up words,
but he does use obscure or archaic ones. Tonight I'll
check my wife's OED.
-John
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.