Urth and Whorl mailing lists
The Urth list — 6 messages, 3 voices, 17 Oct 2000
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2401
----- Original Message -----
From: Ranjit Bhatnagar <ranjit at moonmilk.com>
...
4 quoted lines
Please discuss on the lists and/or send me your opinions:
* Is it really necessary to have two lists, or would one be
more comfortable?
Considering the frequency of cross-list and hybrid discussions, I'm inclined to favor a unified list, myself.
2 quoted lines
* Would you be offended or annoyed by advertising inserted
into every message?
(sigh!) well, c'est la vie! Beats no messages at all. Would this require HTML capabilities on the part of our mail programs?
2 quoted lines
* Is the ability to search the message archive for keywords
useful to you?
yes, quite.
4 quoted lines
Any other advice or suggestions would be welcomed.
Ranjit Bhatnagar
Keeper of the Urth and Whorl lists
And once again, we are tremendously in your debt.
↳ follows, by subject match Talarican
----- Original Message -----
From: Ranjit Bhatnagar <ranjit at moonmilk.com>
...
4 quoted lines
Please discuss on the lists and/or send me your opinions:
* Is it really necessary to have two lists, or would one be
more comfortable?
Considering the frequency of cross-list and hybrid discussions, I'm inclined to favor a unified list, myself.
2 quoted lines
* Would you be offended or annoyed by advertising inserted
into every message?
(sigh!) well, c'est la vie! Beats no messages at all. Would this require HTML capabilities on the part of our mail programs?
2 quoted lines
* Is the ability to search the message archive for keywords
useful to you?
yes, quite.
4 quoted lines
Any other advice or suggestions would be welcomed.
Ranjit Bhatnagar
Keeper of the Urth and Whorl lists
And once again, we are tremendously in your debt.
↳ follows, by subject match Talarican
Folks,
Here's my small contribution to the future form of the
Urth and Whorl lists.
10 quoted lines
At 8:23 am PDT on 17 October 2000, Ranjit Bhatnagar
wrote:
[snip]
Please discuss on the lists and/
or send me your opinions:
* Is it really necessary to have
two lists, or would one be
more comfortable?
Personally I prefer two, as I find that it makes threads
easier to follow, but it's not a big issue; I could deal
with one big list, if that's what others prefer.
3 quoted lines
* Would you be offended or
annoyed by advertising inserted
into every message?
I'd rather not have advertising if it can be avoided, but
I'd much rather have advertising than no list at all. I
imagine it won't be too difficult to ignore ads.
3 quoted lines
* Is the ability to search the
message archive for keywords
useful to you?
Oh yes indeed.
2 quoted lines
Any other advice or suggestions
would be welcomed.
Well, this isn't advice or a suggestion, but I'm very grate-
ful to you for running this list for us, and for keeping it
up even in the face of danger and disaster. Thank you.
2 quoted lines
Ranjit Bhatnagar
Keeper of the Urth and Whorl lists
Mark Millman (Nacre)
kibbitzer on the Urth and Whorl lists
↳ follows, by subject match mark millman
Folks,
Here's my small contribution to the future form of the
Urth and Whorl lists.
10 quoted lines
At 8:23 am PDT on 17 October 2000, Ranjit Bhatnagar
wrote:
[snip]
Please discuss on the lists and/
or send me your opinions:
* Is it really necessary to have
two lists, or would one be
more comfortable?
Personally I prefer two, as I find that it makes threads
easier to follow, but it's not a big issue; I could deal
with one big list, if that's what others prefer.
3 quoted lines
* Would you be offended or
annoyed by advertising inserted
into every message?
I'd rather not have advertising if it can be avoided, but
I'd much rather have advertising than no list at all. I
imagine it won't be too difficult to ignore ads.
3 quoted lines
* Is the ability to search the
message archive for keywords
useful to you?
Oh yes indeed.
2 quoted lines
Any other advice or suggestions
would be welcomed.
Well, this isn't advice or a suggestion, but I'm very grate-
ful to you for running this list for us, and for keeping it
up even in the face of danger and disaster. Thank you.
2 quoted lines
Ranjit Bhatnagar
Keeper of the Urth and Whorl lists
Mark Millman (Nacre)
kibbitzer on the Urth and Whorl lists
William Ansley19 Oct 2000, 01:20original
↳ follows, by subject match mark millman
8 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
"Talarican" <exultnttalarican at mindspring.com> wrote:
...
> Please discuss on the lists and/or send me your opinions:
* Is it really necessary to have two lists, or would one be
more comfortable?
>
Considering the frequency of cross-list and hybrid discussions, I'm inclined to favor a unified list, myself.
I also favor a single list.
3 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
* Would you be offended or annoyed by advertising inserted
into every message?
(sigh!) well, c'est la vie! Beats no messages at all. Would this require HTML capabilities on the part of our mail programs?
I would say an absolute no to any ads that were not plain text. I would prefer no ads, but will put up with plain text ads rather than have no list.
3 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
* Is the ability to search the message archive for keywords
useful to you?
yes, quite.
I consider the search capability to be a very good thing. And, if you can include it in the next incarnation of the list, don't keep it such a secret next time, i.e., put a link to the search page in the addendum tacked onto every message or digest.
1 quoted line
> Any other advice or suggestions would be welcomed.
See previous response.
4 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
>
Ranjit Bhatnagar
Keeper of the Urth and Whorl lists
And once again, we are tremendously in your debt.
I heartily second this.
William Ansley
William Ansley19 Oct 2000, 01:20original
↳ follows, by subject match William Ansley
8 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
"Talarican" <exultnttalarican at mindspring.com> wrote:
...
> Please discuss on the lists and/or send me your opinions:
* Is it really necessary to have two lists, or would one be
more comfortable?
>
Considering the frequency of cross-list and hybrid discussions, I'm inclined to favor a unified list, myself.
I also favor a single list.
3 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
* Would you be offended or annoyed by advertising inserted
into every message?
(sigh!) well, c'est la vie! Beats no messages at all. Would this require HTML capabilities on the part of our mail programs?
I would say an absolute no to any ads that were not plain text. I would prefer no ads, but will put up with plain text ads rather than have no list.
3 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
* Is the ability to search the message archive for keywords
useful to you?
yes, quite.
I consider the search capability to be a very good thing. And, if you can include it in the next incarnation of the list, don't keep it such a secret next time, i.e., put a link to the search page in the addendum tacked onto every message or digest.
1 quoted line
> Any other advice or suggestions would be welcomed.
See previous response.
4 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
>
Ranjit Bhatnagar
Keeper of the Urth and Whorl lists
And once again, we are tremendously in your debt.
I heartily second this.
William Ansley
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.