Croixcodile Keystone Kops?
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 21 Jan 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2547

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Talarican — 21 Jan 2001, 00:17

"Who wrote that table of figures in Marsch's copy of _A Field Guide to the
Animals of Sainte Anne_, which officer Constant identified as ballistics
tables for a .35 cal rifle, and cited as evidence 'John V. Marsch' (Victor
Trenchard) came to St. Croix intending to assasinate someone by sniping"
would make a good IAQ if the answer were not so obvious.

The "real" Dr. Marsch, avid hunter that he was, to judge by his journal
entries, calculated and wrote down these figures. (1) See a critter, (2)
look it up in the _Field Guide_ to identify it, (3) consult the ballistics
table in the same cover to see how best to kill it. I have to wonder if this
somehow signals that the real Dr. Marsch was doomed to failure in any case,
since he so blithely destroys what he discovers?

Victor, having learned (strangely enough) sufficiently of anthropology and
academic life, during his sojourn in the back of beyond, to fool every
professor on both planets into accepting him without question upon his
return, never learned to shoot and probably never bothered to learn the
significance of ballistics tables. Thus, 'John V. Marsch' (Victor) told
Constant he was a terrible shot and knew nothing of the figures.

Yet Constant and the other officers no doubt had learned from the journals
that Marsch claimed to be a great shot with a .35 rifle. Did the Croix
secret police think this inconsistency proved their theory that "Marsch" was
an assasin from sisterworld?

Or had the police read the clues in the journals and Victor's prison
writings to figure out he was an impostor, therefore presumably up to no
good in any event?

An interesting clue: in the framing tale of "V.R.T.", the officer assigned
to review the case told his fellow officer that the case was criminal, not
political.

Talarican
(as you can see, what they call my obsession and mania, was in ancient times
a respected academic discipline, which they named 'anthropology'!)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michael Straight — 22 Jan 2001, 08:45
  follows, by subject match Talarican

> On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Talarican wrote:
> An interesting clue: in the framing tale of "V.R.T.", the officer assigned
> to review the case told his fellow officer that the case was criminal, not
> political.

Wasn't "Marsch" originally arrested in connection with Number Five's
murder of his "father"?  Even if, after they arrested Number Five, they
continued to hold "Marsch" because they suspected him of being a spy, his
case would probably still be officially classified as criminal.

-Rostrum

------------------------------------------------------------------------------