Digest urth.v030.n088
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 15 Apr 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2585

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

akt — 15 Apr 2001, 19:36

Quoth William Ansley:

> I have just finished listening to a series of taped lectures called
> _The Life and Writings of Geoffrey Chaucer_*. Somewhere in this
> series, the lecturer talks about how Chaucer inserts himself as a
> character, the narrator, in _The Canterbury Tales_. He questions how
> much we should believe the narrator and says, "Chaucer may be the
> first unreliable narrator in English literature." This gave me quite
> a start.
> 
> Well, well. Wolfe has an even longer and more distinguished literary
> legacy than I realized.

It is important to distinguish between the unreliable narrator, a
creature of the author, and the unreliable author.  In Chaucer's case,
the lecturer may well be correct. (It's been quite a while since I've
read!) But the fascinating thing, for the few of us who have been
following John Crowley's Aegypt series, is that the *author*, especially
in -Daemonomania-, appears to be unreliable, in a *third-person*
narration. Unreliable does not mean careless--I have been complaining
about carelessness in RttW and I don't want the two
confused--unreliability in a narrator or an author is deliberate. But
different.

-alga

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adam Stephanides — 19 Apr 2001, 09:56
  follows, by subject match akt

> on 4/15/01 6:36 PM, akt at attglobal.net at akt at attglobal.net wrote:
> But the fascinating thing, for the few of us who have been
> following John Crowley's Aegypt series, is that the *author*, especially
> in -Daemonomania-, appears to be unreliable, in a *third-person*
> narration.

Since Ranjit has given us permission to discuss Crowley here, could you tell
us what you're referring to?

--Adam

------------------------------------------------------------------------------