John Crowley committee, re: ES: why?

The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 21 Apr 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2596

Michael Andre-Driussi21 Apr 2001, 17:52original
Adam wrote about ENGINE SUMMER, including this bit:
1 quoted line
The other clues fit in with the suspicion aroused by this one. Near the start of the fifth facet of the second crystal, Rush asks "Do you know this story better than I do?" and the angel replies: "Go on. It's not for my sake you tell it." At first this seems to have an obvious meaning: Rush tells the story for the sake of the city of angels as a whole. But on further thought, this doesn't really work. If the angel knows Rush's story, then so does the city. If the angel is talking about how this Rush will tell the story, then she doesn't know this either. So for who else's sake could Rush be telling the story? In light of the preceding clue, I submit that the answer is Rush himself; and ultimately Rush's host, who will thus be able to prolong his "possession" by Rush.
There is also the obvious metafictional answer: it is not for the angels, nor their city, but only for the reader of ENGINE SUMMER. This ties in with the large and complex "reader/text" mode (where Rush is like a text and the recording angel is like a reader; and they are all fictions in a story, trying to work out another story, for a reader who is above and beyond them). Unfortunately this has a side-effect of implicating the real reader with the torture. "Why are you torturing me?" "To entertain the reader. Look, it is working--she smiles!" =mantis= Sirius Fiction Catalog and errata sheet at http://www.sirius.com/~mantis/
Adam Stephanides22 Apr 2001, 22:03original

↳ follows, by subject match Michael Andre-Driussi

Hello, Michael: You seem to have sent two posts to the urth list, identical in text, but one with the above subject line and the other with the subject line "Re: ENGINE SUMMER: why?" Did you accidentally send out the wrong post? I would like to hear more about this "John Crowley committee"! --Adam

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.