Phillip Pullman [Digest urth.v030.n091]
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 23 Apr 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2598

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

John Bishop — 23 Apr 2001, 16:10

I'll chime in to agree with the Pullman consensus: the
third book fails to close the arc started in the first
two, and drops the ball thematically and practically.

(*mild spoiler*) A reviewer elsewhere [on the Bujold
list] spoke of "boinking to save the universe".  I therefore
re-read that section closely, and it's not certain they did
"boink", but it's likely--and it just doesn't make sense,
given what went before, or how things were shown to work in
the multiverse he proposed.
(*end spoiler*)

I liked _Golden_Compass_ enough to buy one of Pullman's
other novels, _Ruby_in_the_Smoke_, which turns out to have
all the same virtues and flaws as the "His Dark Materials"
triology in one volume: really good characters, a wonderfully
detailed portrayal of an imagined world (in this case 1878
London), an interesting situation--and a total collapse 
into nonsense at the end, when the author can't seem to
figure out how to end the story without breaking his own
rules.

(*Serious spoiler for _Ruby_in_the_Smoke_)
The villian is Mrs Holland (a nasty old lady who runs a
lodging house in Wapping and a gang on the side, and who
I hoped would continue because she was such a wonderful,
clever, perceptive villian) confronts the heroine at the
climax of the book.  When all is almost in her grasp, she
suddenly _goes_mad_ and _kills_herself_ in a couple of
paragraphs!  This absurd action is completely unforshadowed,
no matter how convenient for the heroine it is.
(*end spoiler)

There were other things to boggle at, but that one truly
shocked me--how could an author so competent would let that
text even get written, let alone printed escapes me.

What a shame.

	-John Bishop

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

William Ansley — 23 Apr 2001, 23:10
  follows, by subject match John Bishop

> At 4:10 PM -0400 4/23/01, John Bishop wrote:
> I liked _Golden_Compass_ enough to buy one of Pullman's
> other novels, _Ruby_in_the_Smoke_, which turns out to have
> all the same virtues and flaws as the "His Dark Materials"
> triology in one volume: really good characters, a wonderfully
> detailed portrayal of an imagined world (in this case 1878
> London), an interesting situation--and a total collapse
> into nonsense at the end, when the author can't seem to
> figure out how to end the story without breaking his own
> rules.

Thank you, John!

This is so much better put than my messages. That's exactly how I 
felt; the last book collapsed into nonsense and he broke his own 
rules.

I wish I hadn't brought up the anti-religious aspect of the books at 
all now. It really was a side issue.

William Ansley

------------------------------------------------------------------------------