{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2618",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 2618,
    "subject": "Crowley: Edward Kelley article",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2001-05-01T17:25:51+00:00",
    "last": "2001-05-01T17:25:51+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0030-0370@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Adam Stephanides",
        "address": "adamsteph at earthlink.net"
      },
      "date": "2001-05-01T17:25:51+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Crowley: Edward Kelley article",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "For those who are interested in the historical background to the Aegypt\nbooks, there is a five-page article in the April 19, 2001 issue of the\nLONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS on Edward Kelley, John Dee's partner, dealing both\nwith his years with Dee and his subsequent career.  I just skimmed the\narticle (and I don't remember that much about Kelley from the books, to be\nhonest) so I can't say how relevant it is to the books.\n\nThe LRB has a website (www.lrb.co.uk), but the article isn't online, at\nleast not yet.\n\n--Adam"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}