The NECRONOMICON

The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 13 Jun 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2679

Roy C. Lackey13 Jun 2001, 13:32original
2 quoted lines · depth 2
mantis wrote: Ach, Roy--he got you!<<
That's what I get for not doing the homework!
1 quoted line · depth 2
Since LUSTY LAWYER by Amanda Ros is the forgery (?) in PEACE, this is the one for the invisible library: the others I assume are all real titles.<<
I don't know about the rest, but of the NECRONOMICON, Gold claims to have "just wrote it" (215), and that it was "never mentioned in print anywhere until the providential gentleman I spoke of a few moments ago made the entire thing up. Now it has achieved reality . . ." (216) So I'm confused. If HPL made it up, and Gold wrote it, did (does) it exist or not? If not, who gets credit for it in the Invisible Library? -Roy
Michael Straight13 Jun 2001, 15:20original

↳ follows, by subject match Roy C. Lackey

2 quoted lines
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Roy C. Lackey wrote: I don't know about the rest, but of the NECRONOMICON, Gold claims to have "just wrote it" (215), and that it was "never mentioned in print anywhere until the providential gentleman I spoke of a few moments ago made the entire thing up. Now it has achieved reality . . ." (216) So I'm confused. If HPL made it up, and Gold wrote it, did (does) it exist or not? If not, who gets credit for it in the Invisible Library?
In the Peace universe, NECRONOMICON is a fictional book made up by HPL which Gold then "wrote," inspired by HPL's idea, in order to dupe someone into thinking that the book really exists. So there are two imaginary titles: NECRONOMICON, a book of horrors imagined by HPL and Louis Gold's NECRONOMICON, a fake book of horrors imagined by Gene Wolfe. -Rostrum

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.