...sigh...

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes28 Jun 2001, 09:58original

4 quoted lines · 1–3 deep

Maybe this is why some hard SF people can't stand Wolfe.

That, and the fact that his stories aren't generally about problems to be solved by technological means.

Except maybe "Alien Stones."

Do we have to argue about everything around here? (Stumbles backward at the deafening massed roar of YEEESSSS!) Oh. Okay. Well, then, in that case, may I point out the word "generally" in my previous post... Blatt, blatt,

Michael Straight28 Jun 2001, 14:16original

↳ follows, by subject match Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

6 quoted lines · 1–4 deep

On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: Maybe this is why some hard SF people can't stand Wolfe.

That, and the fact that his stories aren't generally about problems to be solved by technological means.

Except maybe "Alien Stones."

Do we have to argue about everything around here?

Sorry I wasn't clear. I mentioned that more as the exception that proves your rule. It's a nifty engineer's spin on "solved by technological means" that I wouldn't have thought to describe that way if you hadn't used that phrase. And, of course, the story's about more than a problem to be solved by technological means. I didn't get the ending (particularly the bit about one's marital status in the resurrection) until I reread it after the whole Clinton/Lewinsky affair, which made me laugh when the aliens said "It depends on how you define 'is'" -- which made me pay more attention to the comment and realize what they were talking about. -Rostrum

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.