Butterfly crush
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 03 Aug 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2756

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Tony Ellis — 03 Aug 2001, 08:43

> Michael Straight wrote:
> Well, if you're willing to admit it's illogical, I can't argue with you,

Sorry, but I admitted no such thing. The 'logic' I said I wouldn't mind
giving a miss was very deliberately placed in inverted commas.

> but I think dismissing objections as "just the Crushed Butterfly theory"
> is ridiculous.  All of human history and society would be very, very, very
> different if men died immediately after having intercourse.

Different, certainly. "Very, very, very different" is conjecture. Would the
changes you describe necessarily all work in the same direction, and shift
history onto a completely different track, or would half of them cancel out
the other half, and the overall shape of history remain more or less the
same?

And that's just the Time Is A River theory. How about the Many Universes
theory, where every quantum event since the big bang may have created
another reality, or a potential reality? In that case, all Wolfe is doing is
showing us one of the more interesting, lower probability worlds.

I don't see how dismissing two of these theories in favour of a third, when
in fact no one knows what happens when human history is altered, has
anything to do with logic at all.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michael Straight — 03 Aug 2001, 14:15
  follows, by subject match Tony Ellis

Dan'l said most of what I wanted to say except for this:

> On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Tony Ellis wrote:
> And that's just the Time Is A River theory. How about the Many Universes
> theory, where every quantum event since the big bang may have created
> another reality, or a potential reality? In that case, all Wolfe is doing is
> showing us one of the more interesting, lower probability worlds.

Many Universes means all possible universes exist.  I can't belive this is
a possible universe.

> I don't see how dismissing two of these theories in favour of a third, when
> in fact no one knows what happens when human history is altered

This is actually a radically sceptical view of history: you're saying that
we can never know anything about the causes of events.  Because to say
that x is the cause of an event is to say that if x were absent the event
would not have happened.  Every time we try to determine why something
happened in history we are making statements about what would have
happened if history were altered.

And, as Dan'l pointed out, there's an awful lot of history we ascribe to
causes related to fatherhood and sexuality (I'll add how different the
relationship between church/clergy and western civilization would have
been if all men were celibate up until they mated and died).

-Rostrum

------------------------------------------------------------------------------