# Clarification

*The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 10 Aug 2001*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2776>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Tony Ellis
*10 Aug 2001, 10:10*

Dan'l wrote (quoting me):

>> She's still being given something to
>> think about, which was my original argument.

> Well, no, it wasn't.

Well, yes, it was.

> You actually wrote,
> I would hope that a child reading Pullman's book might be
> very interested to learn that a word used by Christianity
> to mean an incarnation of evil originally meant something
> as harmless as "spirit",  and might wonder what other little
> misappropriations and mistakes may have taken place over
> the years.

Yes, and -before- that, I wrote that I didn't agree that Pullman was using
the word 'daemon' solely to irritate, and that:

> The Marriage of Heaven and Hell probably irritated a few
> easily-irritated Christians in its time too, but what it was supposed to do
> was make people think

That was my point. Provocative words being used to promote the process of
independent thought. I could have left it at that, but I chose to illustrate
my point with an example of how that might happen.

---