{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/2952",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 2952,
    "subject": "archives",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2002-02-11T21:25:58+00:00",
    "last": "2002-02-11T21:25:58+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0202-136@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "maa32",
        "address": "maa32 at dana.ucc.nau.edu"
      },
      "date": "2002-02-11T21:25:58+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) archives",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "This is just an observation, and it really doesn't mean anything.  I just \nnoticed that when Andy Robertson replies to a post, it uses the original \nsenders ID on the archives (at least, it does that with mine) (in effect, it \nlooks like I posted almost twice as much as I really did in the last archive).\n I really don't mind this at all, but it's kind of odd, and could be confusing \nin trying to figure out who said what. (In a personal interaction with another \nposter, one of Andy's statements was mistakenly attributed to me, and this \nmight explain why ... I hadn't noticed before). Oh well, we'll just consider \nthis a cozy intellectual community. You don't mind sharing your identity, do \nyou Andy? :) We could be like Silkhorn. \"Did Silk or Horn say that?\"\nI don't know if it does that with everyone who responds or just Andy, but I \nwas wondering if there was some cause.\n\nAlso, does anybody know if any prominent critic (besides Clute and Dirda, of \ncourse) like Harold Bloom has ever read Gene Wolfe?  If Bloom praises Crowley \nand David Lindsay so highly, I can only imagine he would not dismiss Wolfe out \nof hand if he read his work (as he dismisses, say, Dorris Lessing).  Alga, \ndidn't you have some vague connection with Bloom at one time? (sorry if I \nmisremembered that).  Foist Wolfe on him.\nMarc Aramini"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}