# archives *The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 11 Feb 2002* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### maa32 *11 Feb 2002, 21:25* This is just an observation, and it really doesn't mean anything. I just noticed that when Andy Robertson replies to a post, it uses the original senders ID on the archives (at least, it does that with mine) (in effect, it looks like I posted almost twice as much as I really did in the last archive). I really don't mind this at all, but it's kind of odd, and could be confusing in trying to figure out who said what. (In a personal interaction with another poster, one of Andy's statements was mistakenly attributed to me, and this might explain why ... I hadn't noticed before). Oh well, we'll just consider this a cozy intellectual community. You don't mind sharing your identity, do you Andy? :) We could be like Silkhorn. "Did Silk or Horn say that?" I don't know if it does that with everyone who responds or just Andy, but I was wondering if there was some cause. Also, does anybody know if any prominent critic (besides Clute and Dirda, of course) like Harold Bloom has ever read Gene Wolfe? If Bloom praises Crowley and David Lindsay so highly, I can only imagine he would not dismiss Wolfe out of hand if he read his work (as he dismisses, say, Dorris Lessing). Alga, didn't you have some vague connection with Bloom at one time? (sorry if I misremembered that). Foist Wolfe on him. Marc Aramini ---