Wolfe interview online

Endy920 Feb 2002, 21:39original

Great interview at Science Fiction Weekly printed 2/18/02. http://www.scifi.com/sfw/advance/18_interview.html

Dennis/Endy http://home.attbi.com/~phleblori1/endy9/index.htm "The journey is better than the inn" - Cervantes -- --

Roy C. Lackey21 Feb 2002, 07:18original

↳ follows, by subject match Endy9

3 quoted lines

Great interview at Science Fiction Weekly printed 2/18/02. http://www.scifi.com/sfw/advance/18_interview.html

I really enjoyed the Huddleston interview, and there are a lot of things that can be discussed about it, but the one thing that struck me hardest was that Wolfe now has a computer and internet access. I wonder what effect that fact will have upon this list. For myself, when I knew that Wolfe didn't have those things, and at his age didn't seem likely to get them, it didn't matter so much what I wrote on the list, because he wasn't ever going to see it. Now . . . -Roy

Andy Robertson21 Feb 2002, 21:36original

↳ follows, by subject match Roy C. Lackey

Original Message -----

2 quoted lines

From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net> I really enjoyed the Huddleston interview, and there are a lot of things that can be discussed about it, but the one thing that struck me hardest was that Wolfe now has a computer and internet access. I wonder what effect that fact will have upon this list.

Well, I have e-mailed him :-) hartshorn

Kieran Cleary22 Feb 2002, 10:06original

↳ follows, by subject match Andy Robertson

Just read the Wolfe interview....thanks to Dennis/Endy for the heads-up. Slightly puzzled, though, by the following..

1 quoted line

Then David Hartwell came back and said, "We have to put in a paragraph at the end. It says, 'Oh, by the way, Severian goes off world and he gets a white hole and he comes back and inserts it in our sun and hides the universe'

Hides the universe? Kieran C.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.