Nacre glosses the hits

The Urth list — 3 messages, 3 voices, 21 Mar 2002
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3066

Michael Andre-Driussi21 Mar 2002, 22:03original
4 quoted lines
Nacre wrote: The Arimapsian Legacy CS This is a typo; the title is "The Arimaspian Legacy".
Is it? Dang! I was just cringing at the Ultan's Library typo (which may in fact be correct according to your title), so I double-checked against "Urth Man Extraordinary" (not "Urth Man Extraordinare"!) and they spell it like I did. So another typo for Phil Stephensen-Payne to fix up!
3 quoted lines
Lord of the Land Lovecraft's Legacy, BNH #2 There's another typo here--mantis means YBH #2.
No, UME gives it as BEST NEW HORROR 2. Is that incorrect? Tell me, tell Phil.
3 quoted lines
Slow Children CS The full title is "Slow Children at Play".
Oops. That one is my fault.
13 quoted lines
(Digression: The chapbooks aren't hard to find--they're all available from Cheap Street--but they're expensive, averaging over $50 each for pamphlets, and "Empires" is only available in (a) very costly editions, again from Cheap Street; (b) the practically unavailable Crank! #2; and (c) the Best of Crank! anthology--easy enough to find, and reasonably priced, but it still means buying a whole book for a single Wolfe story. If anyone knows of a small publisher who might be interested (mantis?), a deal similar to the one that Cholfin must have worked out with Cheap Street and Wolfe could perhaps be arranged, by which a more affordable volume collecting "Empires" and the chapbook stories would be published.)
My understanding is that Bryan Cholfin =bought= the remaining copies of EF&F as pre-requisite to publishing the "everyman" edition. (Yeah, I know, I know: "Think of it as an =investment=.") That was in, what, 1992? It seems impossible these days to do any small press Wolfe book. The barriers are real, and quite solid. I have tried, Nick Gevers has tried, there must be others reading this who have tried. Such things have been done in the past by Ziesing, Nesfa, and United Mythologies, but they aren't doing them now. Then again, new small press folk are self-generating all the time, so it could happen. As much as I wish it would, I really, really doubt it.
3 quoted lines
I'm very fond of "The Monday Man", which is one of the first-person character stories; it's set in the Depres- sion, and is about role reversal.
I thought this was the one where the policeman is telling the story and the role-reversal was between . . . well, I don't want to give it away. But while it is set in mundane USA, it has a link to the Presence Chamber of Urth. IRRC, and I'm probably mixing it up something horrible. =mantis=
Mark Millman21 Mar 2002, 23:15original

↳ follows, by subject match Michael Andre-Driussi

mantis,
8 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, mantis (Michael Andre-Driussi) wrote: Nacre wrote:
Lord of the Land Lovecraft's Legacy, BNH #2 There's another typo here--mantis means YBH #2.
No, UME gives it as BEST NEW HORROR 2. Is that incor- rect? Tell me, tell Phil.
This one's my mistake; since the key at the bottom of the list has Year's Best Horror and not Best New Horror, I just assumed BNH was a typo. On checking, _Best New Horror_ is correct. Sorry, mantis.
6 quoted lines
My understanding is that Bryan Cholfin =bought= the re- maining copies of EF&F as pre-requisite to publishing the "everyman" edition. (Yeah, I know, I know: "Think of it as an =investment=.") That was in, what, 1992?
Cheap Street, and their sister business, 20th Century First Editions, still list copies of Empire, so at the very least, Cholfin's copies made it back into the sec- ondary market. The same seems to be the case with _Bib- liomen_, too. (The least expensive versions, as far as I can tell, are the studio samples from Cheap Street--both titles are $85 a copy in that state.)
9 quoted lines
It seems impossible these days to do any small press Wolfe book. The barriers are real, and quite solid. I have tried, Nick Gevers has tried, there must be others reading this who have tried. Such things have been done in the past by Ziesing, Nesfa, and United Mythologies, but they aren't doing them now. Then again, new small press folk are self-generating all the time, so it could happen. As much as I wish it would, I really, really doubt it.
I'm interested; what are those barriers? Please reply off-line if you think this is beyond the interest of the rest of the list.
13 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
I'm very fond of "The Monday Man", which is one of the first-person character stories; it's set in the Depression, and is about role reversal.
I thought this was the one where the policeman is tell- ing the story and the role-reversal was between . . . well, I don't want to give it away. But while it is set in mundane USA, it has a link to the Presence Cham- ber of Urth. IRRC, and I'm probably mixing it up some- thing horrible. =mantis=
I don't remember any Urth reference in "The Monday Man", and I don't think that would have been sporting of Wolfe to have done. But we shouldn't get so worked up over it that we try to string up one another. Nacre
Adam Stephanides26 Mar 2002, 03:00original

↳ follows, by subject match Mark Millman

1 quoted line
on 3/21/02 10:03 PM, Michael Andre-Driussi at mantis at siriusfiction.com wrote: It seems impossible these days to do any small press Wolfe book. The barriers are real, and quite solid. I have tried, Nick Gevers has tried, there must be others reading this who have tried. Such things have been done in the past by Ziesing, Nesfa, and United Mythologies, but they aren't doing them now. Then again, new small press folk are self-generating all the time, so it could happen. As much as I wish it would, I really, really doubt it.
At one point there were four or five small presses publishing Lafferty's as-yet-unpublished works. Then, at about the same time (early 90s, I think) they all stopped. There are still quite a few unpublished novels; hopefully they'll see the light of day eventually. --Adam

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.