brief comment
The Urth list — 4 messages, 4 voices, 07 Apr 2002
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3125
Roy, no big deal, but there IS a scene when he actually is looking at the moon and commenting: "Green came up, bigger and brighter than we ever see it on Blue. Or want to, either." (pg 714 in SFBC BOTSS, chapter 17)
He is talking about Lune here. We are saying the same thing. I'm kind of intrigued by the recent idea that Lune could have near urth gravity. But doesn't the fact that at 30,000 leagues Green is still not as big as Lune indicate that Green can't be much bigger? I mean, Lune would have to be really damned close if Green really were larger at all, and it can't be THAT close.
Marc Aramini
↳ follows, by subject match maa32
Marc,
I'm afraid that your uncritical acceptance
of the 30,000-league figure for Green's
distance from Blue may be a bit dangerous;
after all, Wolfe's characters make mistakes,
conceal the truth, and lie outright all the
time. This figure is given at second hand,
produced by a culture that's had only one
generation of planetside life--the estimate
may be influenced by scales within the
Whorl, where the skylands are only twice as
far away as the Long Sun, and city lights
in those regions are evidently visible at
night.
Likewise Juganu's comment, "We are every-
where": we don't know whether it's a self-
aggrandizing boast, a calculated statement
meant to dishearten his listeners, or an
unthinking assumption. Is Juganu even
aware of Urth before Horn enlists his help
to travel there?
Mark Millman
(Nacre)
28 quoted lines
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, maa32 wrote:
Roy, no big deal, but there IS
a scene when he actually is
looking at the moon and com-
menting:
"Green came up, bigger
and brighter than we
ever see it on Blue.
Or want to, either."
(pg 714 in SFBC BOTSS,
chapter 17)
He is talking about Lune here.
We are saying the same thing.
I'm kind of intrigued by the
recent idea that Lune could
have near urth gravity. But
doesn't the fact that at 30,000
leagues Green is still not as
big as Lune indicate that Green
can't be much bigger? I mean,
Lune would have to be really
damned close if Green really
were larger at all, and it
can't be THAT close.
Marc Aramini
↳ follows, by subject match Mark Millman
Date: Saturday, April 06, 2002 10:41 PM
2 quoted lines · depth 2
Marc wrote:
Roy, no big deal, but there IS a scene when he actually is looking at the moon and commenting:
"Green came up, bigger and brighter than we ever see it on Blue. Or want to, either." (pg 714 in SFBC BOTSS, chapter 17)
He is talking about Lune here. We are saying the same thing. I'm kind of intrigued by the recent idea that Lune could have near urth gravity.<<
Please don't get started on that! As mantis has already hinted, if there is any evidence to support that idea, it's extratextual. No scene, directly or indirectly, takes place on Lune in the Urth Cycle, and there's not a word in the text about Lune's gravity.
1 quoted line · depth 2
But doesn't the fact that at 30,000 leagues Green is still not as big as Lune indicate that Green can't be much bigger? I mean, Lune would have to be
really damned close if Green really were larger at all, and it can't be THAT close.<<
I could offer the feeble excuse that, on the occasion you cited above, Lune had just risen and therefore Urth's atmosphere magnified Hoof's view of it, just as Moon looks bigger near the horizon than at zenith on Earth, and Hoof had limited occasions to observe relative sizes, but I don't know that that would be sufficient reason for his blanket statements that Lune appears larger than Green.
Silkhorn's statement, cited earlier, that implied there wasn't much difference in size between Blue and Green, coupled with these recent arguments that seem to indicate that Green must be close in size to Lune, leads to the conclusion that all three bodies are about the same size. Add to that my observations about the problems a much higher gravity on Blue would present for the inhumi, and where does that lead to?: That Blue and Green are about the same size and have about the same gravity, and both correspond to the size and gravity of Lune. That Blue is therefore the size of Lune, which means that Blue can't possibly be Urth. That Silkhorn & Co. woke up on Urth and just didn't notice that they weighed six times as much as they were used to.
No, I can't account for the apparent discrepancies in the text, or the apparent violations of the laws of physics. I just don't see any good reason to believe that Blue is Urth/Ushas.
I can't endorse your theories about trees/inhumi/Neighbors/people either, but I will concede that there is something odd going on wrt trees in the SS series--I just don't know what. Here's one you haven't mentioned before. Near the end of the second chapter of RTTW, Pig is seized by both fear and wonder when he discovers that he is in the midst of a wood but can't touch a tree or be touched by one. It is his proximity to Silkhorn that seems to account for it, but he doesn't know that.
-Roy
Michael Straight08 Apr 2002, 19:55original
↳ follows, by subject match Roy C. Lackey
2 quoted lines
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Roy C. Lackey wrote:
I can't endorse your theories about trees/inhumi/Neighbors/people either, but I will concede that there is something odd going on wrt trees in the SS series--I just don't know what. Here's one you haven't mentioned before. Near the end of the second chapter of RTTW, Pig is seized by both fear and wonder when he discovers that he is in the midst of a wood but can't touch a tree or be touched by one. It is his proximity to Silkhorn that seems to account for it, but he doesn't know that.
Could this be that he's following Silkhorn, who is using his
Neighbor-given ability to find paths through bushes?
Although it's possible that this works because the trees are moving to make a path for Horn, the way it's described in the text it seems more like some sort of extraordinary perception Horn has that enables him to see the one clear path that most people can't find.
-Rostrum
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.