# uncut dogs *The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 22 Apr 2001* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### Andy Robertson *22 Apr 2001, 12:28* ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tony Ellis" > So. I don't really have a theory. It's another of those little bits of 5HC > I > keep coming back to and coming back to. An awfully crude queston. When Marsh remarks that the boy is "uncut" and *therefore* when he was with the girl, would "bind", or something like that (sorry I can't lay my hand on my copy of 5HC rigth now) , what the hell is he talking about? "They would bind, I know. I think I would kill them if I found them like that" (from memory) This seems to refer to the way a male dog gets stuck up inside a female one and cannot disengage. I am uncircumsised and I can assure all you prick-trimmed Yanks that nothing like that at all happens. Why did Marsh think this? Does this signal something about Abo sexual behaviour? (Or are there entire realms of sexual experiene I have yet to taste? :-) hartshorn ---