uncut dogs
The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 22 Apr 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3206

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Andy Robertson — 22 Apr 2001, 12:28

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Tony Ellis" <LittleSense at necronomicon.co.uk>
> So. I don't really have a theory. It's another of those little bits of 5HC
> I
> keep coming back to and coming back to.

An awfully crude queston.

When Marsh remarks that the boy is "uncut" and *therefore* when he was with
the girl, would "bind", or something like that (sorry I can't lay my hand on
my copy of 5HC rigth now) , what the hell is he talking about?


"They would bind, I know.  I think I would kill them if I found them like
that"

(from memory)


This seems to refer to the way a male dog gets stuck up inside a female one
and cannot disengage.  I am uncircumsised and I can assure all you
prick-trimmed Yanks that nothing like that at all happens.


Why did Marsh think this?

Does this signal something about Abo sexual behaviour?

(Or are there entire realms of sexual experiene I have yet to taste?  :-)


    hartshorn

------------------------------------------------------------------------------