Urth List Active?

The Urth list — 4 messages, 3 voices, 30 Jun 2002
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3328

Josh Geller30 Jun 2002, 10:23original
I haven't received any mail from the urth list for a while, and wonder if it is still active. J.
Steve Strickland30 Jun 2002, 12:14original

↳ follows, by subject match Josh Geller

Funny, yesterday I was wondering the same thing. ----- Original Message -----
10 quoted lines
From: "Josh Geller" <dclxvi at dclxvi.best.vwh.net> To: <urth at urth.net> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:23 AM Subject: (urth) Urth List Active? I haven't received any mail from the urth list for a while, and wonder if it is still active. J. --
Josh Geller30 Jun 2002, 12:29original

↳ follows, by subject match Steve Strickland

Now we no longer wonder. Huzzah! J. ___
14 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Steve Strickland wrote: Funny, yesterday I was wondering the same thing. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Geller" <dclxvi at dclxvi.best.vwh.net> To: <urth at urth.net> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:23 AM Subject: (urth) Urth List Active?
I haven't received any mail from the urth list for a while, and wonder if it is still active. J. --
--
Phoebe Davis30 Jun 2002, 19:26original

↳ follows, by subject match Josh Geller

Glad to know you all are still out there - it truly seems to be feast or famine sometimes. Phoebe
25 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
--- Josh Geller <dclxvi at dclxvi.best.vwh.net> wrote: Now we no longer wonder. Huzzah! J. ___ On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Steve Strickland wrote:
Funny, yesterday I was wondering the same thing. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Geller" <dclxvi at dclxvi.best.vwh.net> To: <urth at urth.net> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 5:23 AM Subject: (urth) Urth List Active?
I haven't received any mail from the urth list for a while, and wonder if it is still active. J. --
--
--

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.