{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3396",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 3396,
    "subject": "the dog-boy of Carnies Post",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2002-08-04T19:29:29+00:00",
    "last": "2002-08-04T19:29:29+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0208-1535@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Robert Borski",
        "address": "rborski at charter.net"
      },
      "date": "2002-08-04T19:29:29+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) the dog-boy of Carnies Post",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Should have included this with my previous post.\n\nRoy again:\n\n--But then, why does Charlie write: \"Anyway, if you have any comments on the\npicture you\nwould like to make, go ahead and make them to me and I will pass them along\nto Candy; she will be glad to hear from you.\"? Why should Candy be glad to\nhear from Weer?--\n\nBecause she's been perhaps prostituting herself to Den, and now wants\nfurther contact with (or money from) him. Once again from Charlie T.'s\nletter: \"...I heard that Candy was trying to get Doris to turn a few tricks\nwhen Mrs. M. wasn't looking, so she could make some getaway money...\"\nApparently, Candy knows enough about the business from personal experience\nto explain, er, the ins-and-outs of the process to \"Little Cinder.\"\n\nYet further evidence that ladies' man \"Mr. M.\" may be Den Weer.\n\nRobert Borski"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}