{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3489",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 3489,
    "subject": "offensive napoleon",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2002-10-17T17:42:59+00:00",
    "last": "2002-10-17T17:42:59+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0210-1874@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "maa32",
        "address": "maa32 at dana.ucc.nau.edu"
      },
      "date": "2002-10-17T17:42:59+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) offensive napoleon",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Maybe I'm more juvenile than the rest of you, but I always assumed Napoleon \nwas trying to foster an erection all of the time because of his \nwell-documented impotence.\n\n\"In the 19th century, more complex considerations arose. Another royal penis, \nthis one attached to the Emperor Napoleon, defied the best doctors of his \ntime. This was because its smallness and unwillingness to stand up when \nrequired were the results of an endocrinal problem beyond the reach of 19th \ncentury medicine. Later in the century Dr Freud revolutionised thinking about \nsex with his insistence that mental factors were the dominant influence.\"\n\nWhatever.  I don't think this is particularly worth discussing, but that is \nthe interpretation I always had (and I think it might be guaranteed to offend \na few people, too).\n\nMarc"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}