Varieties Of Gnosticism
The Urth list — 4 messages, 2 voices, 28 Oct 2002
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3522

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Josh Geller — 28 Oct 2002, 18:24

This is a pretty good article.

http://www.geocities.com/ega_church/gnscript.html











.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Josh Geller — 28 Oct 2002, 18:51
  follows, by subject match Josh Geller

Here's another informative article.

http://www.gnosis.org/gnintro.htm

















.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes — 28 Oct 2002, 19:11
  follows, by subject match Josh Geller

This one is one of the best (and most attractive) 
presentations of gnostic ideas that I -- speaking, of 
course, from a non-gnostic and pretty much ignorant 
point of view -- have ever encountered. Thanks for 
these links.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Geller [mailto:dclxvi at dclxvi.best.vwh.net] 
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:52 AM
> To: 'urth at urth.net'
> Subject: Re: (urth) Varieties Of Gnosticism
> 
> 
> 
> Here's another informative article.
> 
> http://www.gnosis.org/gnintro.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.urth.net/ To unsubscribe: send > "unsubscribe" to 
> urth-request at urth.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Josh Geller — 28 Oct 2002, 19:45
  follows, by subject match Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> This one is one of the best (and most attractive)
> presentations of gnostic ideas that I -- speaking, of
> course, from a non-gnostic and pretty much ignorant
> point of view -- have ever encountered. Thanks for
> these links.

You're most welcome.

Bishop Hoeller has indeed done some very good work.


J.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------