{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3584",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 3584,
    "subject": "claw blood",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2002-11-18T15:57:35+00:00",
    "last": "2002-11-18T15:57:35+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0211-2147@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "maa32",
        "address": "maa32 at dana.ucc.nau.edu"
      },
      "date": "2002-11-18T15:57:35+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) claw blood",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Of course, in talking about perceptions of the Claw's mutability, I was \ntalking about my perceptions as I read it. It has nothing to do with textual \nrightness or wrongness; you can't argue with someone's progression of ideas.  \nIt's impossible.  Those were simply the thoughts I remember having the first \ntime I read the New Sun.  (Remember, too, that I was in the 5th grade or so) \nOf course there are other powers besides temporal powers - powers to alter and \ntransmute at the cellular level, like the deformed hand in UotNS and the water \nto wine in CotC.\nAs far as Sev's DNA on the claw, I thought there was a scene in Urth of the \nNew Sun where he bleeds on the claw from his forehead. (Trying to use it on \nhimself?) That would have been the claw that becomes the claw of the \nconciliator; I could be mistaken; it might be later (or earlier) in the time \nstream in Citadel, in which case I would be wrong.  Just perceptions.  That's \nall.  My point was that simple mysteries have multiple interpretive \npossibilities that change over time, especially in Wolfe.\nMarc Aramini"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}