fulgin?

The Urth list — 4 messages, 4 voices, 07 Feb 2003
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/3834

Andy Robertson07 Feb 2003, 18:28original
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_747664.html?menu=
cilluff1 at optonline.net07 Feb 2003, 19:09original

↳ follows, by subject match Andy Robertson

To quote the great Nigel Tufnel, "it's like, how much more black can it be? And the answer is none, none more black." Jokes aside, you just know these scientists are sci-fi readers, it would be a great nod if they called this new substance fuligin! Original Message: ----------------- From: Andy Robertson andywrobertson at clara.co.uk Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:28:10 +0000 To: urth at urth.net Subject: (urth) fulgin? http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_747664.html?menu=
To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request at urth.net
Josh Geller07 Feb 2003, 19:38original

↳ follows, by subject match cilluff1 at optonline.net

Fuligin is already the color of lamp-black. Interestingly, if you read this article, lamp-black is so black for the same reason this new stuff is. J. ___
4 quoted lines
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andy Robertson wrote: http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_747664.html?menu= --
Tami Whitehead07 Feb 2003, 19:59original

↳ follows, by subject match Josh Geller

Absolutely Josh! from Latin, fuliginosus, full of soot. T.
13 quoted lines
--- Josh Geller <dclxvi at dclxvi.best.vwh.net> wrote: Fuligin is already the color of lamp-black. Interestingly, if you read this article, lamp-black is so black for the same reason this new stuff is. J. ___ On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Andy Robertson wrote:
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_747664.html?menu=
7 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
-- http://www.urth.net/ To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to urth-request at urth.net
-- http://www.urth.net/ To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to
urth-request at urth.net

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.