sev as conciliator - typhon scene

The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 19 Aug 2003
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4175

maa3219 Aug 2003, 06:43original
One more thing, since you asked about the Typhon scene. There has been a lot of disagreement over that scene. I think that Typhon does in fact recognize Severian, others believe that he doesn't. My primary reason is that somewhere in that scene Typhon implies that if Severian bows to him, the Conciliator will also bow to him. I think there is enough parallelism in that scene to justify "recognition" beyond Typhon's desire for the Claw, but no consensus could be reached on that point. There should be plenty in the archives on it from a few months ago that presents both sides, so you can re-read the scene and come to your own decision on it. Marc
Josh Geller19 Aug 2003, 15:01original

↳ follows, by subject match maa32

There is no doubt that Typhon recognizes Severian. The people who disagree with this are wrong. I am sorry, sometimes things are best said very bluntly. . ___
4 quoted lines
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 23:43, maa32 wrote: One more thing, since you asked about the Typhon scene. There has been a lot of disagreement over that scene. I think that Typhon does in fact recognize Severian, others believe that he doesn't. My primary reason is that somewhere in that scene Typhon implies that if Severian bows to him, the Conciliator will also bow to him. I think there is enough parallelism in that scene to justify "recognition" beyond Typhon's desire for the Claw, but no consensus could be reached on that point. There should be plenty in the archives on it from a few months ago that presents both sides, so you can re-read the scene and come to your own decision on it. Marc --

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.