Hethor

The Urth list — 8 messages, 4 voices, 14 Mar 1998
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/421

Alice Turner14 Mar 1998, 11:28original
1 quoted line
As you know, I consider "Kimleesoong" to be the most likely answer to the question of "What is Hethor's true and secret name?"
As a p.s. to this (though I reserve my right to not necessarily agree with it), "Hethor" is an extremely puzzling name. Nearly all the NS names can be traced (mantis can quickly tell you what few can't), but I went though hoops trying to track this one, with no results. (Please don't invoke Egyptian Hathor; it doesn't compute.) -alga-
m.driussi14 Mar 1998, 19:59original

↳ follows, by subject match Alice Turner

Reply: Item #3560425 from URTH at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET03# "BEOCCA AND HETHOR, monks and martyrs of Chertsey (Surrey), killed by the Danes in 870. The memory of these monks, supposed to be as many as ninety, was kept alive in fragmentary chronicles and by William of Malmesbury. Their deaths, like those of monks of Peterborough, Bardney, Ely, and Crowland, were believed to be the work of the same Danish army as that which killed Edmund of East Anglia. It seems unlikely that the number of the monks concerned is accurate. Feast: 10 April. "G.P., p. 143; R.P.S.; C.S.P." (THE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF SAINTS, third edition). ;) =mantis=
Alice Turner15 Mar 1998, 19:25original

↳ follows, by subject match m.driussi

mantis,
1 quoted line
"BEOCCA AND HETHOR, monks and martyrs of Chertsey (Surrey), killed by the Danes in 870. The memory of these monks, supposed to be as many as ninety, was kept alive in fragmentary chronicles and by William of Malmesbury. Their deaths, like those of monks of Peterborough, Bardney, Ely, and Crowland, were believed to be the work of the same Danish army as that which killed Edmund of East Anglia. It seems unlikely that the number of the monks concerned is accurate. Feast: 10 April. "G.P., p. 143; R.P.S.; C.S.P." (THE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF SAINTS, third edition).
Well, GDItH, I own that book, that edition, and I feel absolutely cheated that it's under "B!" Jeez, is there no justice? But seriously, this is a clue that it is a false name. Hethor should not have a saint's name; like Jonas he could have a biblical name, or he could have a "modern" name, biblical or not. This is the first time I have considered Kimleesoong seriously as his name. Hmmmm.
1 quoted line
There is talk in UotNS of sailors getting older, younger, or just staying the same forever, but that is on the ship of Tzadkiel and not Urth. It could be that Hethor found himself in the antichamber, but was able to escape with his powers of thaumatugy (after fathering children, or whatever), and then perhaps spent more time in space before coming back to Urth in Severian's era.
I am sure this is true.
1 quoted line
Of course, Jonas and Hethor (if KLS is indeed his real name) are both Korean, but they served on different ships, or did they?
Jonas is Korean? How so?
1 quoted line
Are the Quasar and Fortunate Cloud the same?
They can't be. Wolfe plays lots of tricks, but not that kind of tricks.
1 quoted line
Incidentally, Severian says to the Hierodules (Famulimus, Babatus, and Ossipago) that Hethor never mentioned his ship's name, but he did, and it was the Quasar. So whose memory is at fault here, Severian or Wolfe's?
Hmmmm. I know you're right, but citation please. (chapter, since we've all got different editions. -alga-
C R Culver16 Mar 1998, 03:55original

↳ follows, by subject match Alice Turner

Alga said:
1 quoted line
Jonas is Korean? How so?<
He certainly speaks Korean. See the description of his feverish ramblings in the Antechamber. Severian notes that Jonas was talking in a nasal, monosyllabic language. Korean is such a language, almost every word ends in a nasal consonant or a vowel, and there are no two-syllable words as such. However, the language could also be Chinese. It's possible.
1 quoted line
Hmmmm. I know you're right, but citation please.<
Well, I pulled out my battered citation-copy of Shadow, and it wasn't where I thought it would be! I assumed Hethor mentioned it in his babblings before the actors in the last chapter, but it appears I was wrong. I'll go check to see if it's in some other places soon. However, it comes to me now that, although Hethor mentioned it, the Quasar might not have been his ship. I believe he mentioned his ship passed the Quasar in the void, I'll sort it out. I imagined:
3 quoted lines
Are the Quasar and Fortunate Cloud the same?< Alga retaliated: They can't be. Wolfe plays lots of tricks, but not that kind of tricks.<
Well, I could respond that Wolfe has hinted that all interstellar ships are the Ship of Tzadkiel, but I don't think he had that idea in mind when he talked of Jonas and Hethor. What would Hethor have done on the SoT anyway? Perhaps it is there he got his experience with mirrors, if he truly worked on the Ship. I hypothesized:
1 quoted line
and then perhaps spent more time in space before coming back to Urth in Severian's era.<
And Alga responded:
1 quoted line
I am sure this is true.<
Well, I'd love to know who helped him get off the planet after the fall of the Monarchy and human endeavours in space. I imagine that Abaia might have gotten him off Urth by the same method he uses to let the undines "swim the void." Christopher R. Culver <crculver at aol.com> http://members.aol.com/crculver/index.html
m.driussi16 Mar 1998, 15:01original

↳ follows, by subject match C R Culver

Reply: Item #5234791 from URTH at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET03# alga, Re: OXFORD BOOK OF SAINTS, yes, I remembered your practice of judging a reference book by its index (or lack thereof) and muttered an oath against OBOS for not having an index and not being adequately cross-referenced--"Savas (Sabas)" has no pointer at "Sabas," for example. But otherwise, a lot of this stuff is in the Lexicon, under "Hethor." (The main clue that "Hethor" is not his true name is given point blank by Agia; but yes, you are right that the rules of Wolfean naming provide corroboration--I hadn't thought of that before.) =mantis= P.S. Hethor's most lucid babbling happens within a dream of Severian's rather than in waking action.
C R Culver16 Mar 1998, 19:57original

↳ follows, by subject match m.driussi

Mantis said:
2 quoted lines
P.S. Hethor's most lucid babbling happens within a dream of Severian's rather than in waking action.<
So Severian is hallucinating someone babbling? Hmm, is this Wolfe's way to throw some of the Christian phenomenon of glossolalia in there? I don't believe it shows up anywhere else in the BotNS. The only problem with saying it is this is that documented glossolalia (almost always) has a vowel-consonant ratio of 1:1 and is polysyllabic, nasal consonants don't show up much either. I still think it was Korean. Christopher R. Culver <crculver at aol.com> http://members.aol.com/crculver/index.html
Charles Dye17 Mar 1998, 08:19original

↳ follows, by subject match C R Culver

C R Culver <CRCulver at aol.com> writes:
2 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
Hmmmm. I know you're right, but citation please.<
Well, I pulled out my battered citation-copy of Shadow, and it wasn't where I thought it would be! I assumed Hethor mentioned it in his babblings before the actors in the last chapter, but it appears I was wrong. I'll go check to see if it's in some other places soon. However, it comes to me now that, although Hethor mentioned it, the Quasar might not have been his ship. I believe he mentioned his ship passed the Quasar in the void, I'll sort it out.
It's Hethor's very first line, in Chapter 30 of Shadow. "M-m-master, when I was on the Quasar I had a paracoita ...." raster at highfiber.com
Alice Turner14 May 1998, 07:57original

↳ follows, by subject match Charles Dye

Oh, and I'm thinking Robin Williams for Hethor. He wouldn't even have to rehearse. -alga-

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.