Gilling's killer (was Re: The Wizard - questions -- answers (spoiler))

The Urth list — 3 messages, 3 voices, 03 Jan 2005
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4287

David DiGiacomo03 Jan 2005, 22:45
3 quoted lines
From: "Russell Wodell" <wrustle at telus.net> What would be Sir Garvaon's motive for killing Gilling? (Rhyme unintentional) And why would Wolfe conceal this for so long?
Jealousy. Garvaon loved Idnn, and was obviously a more worthy suitor than either the monstrous Gilling or the cowardly Svon. It wasn't concealed for very long, as Wolfe's puzzles go.
1 quoted line
For this and other reasons, I am fairly certain that Iddn is the murderer.
When Able says that the killer cannot be punished, Garvaon is dead, but Idnn is still alive.
1 quoted line
She agreed to marry Gilling to achieve power, which she maintains with her army of giantesses, but killed him because sexual congress would mean her death either in coitus or in giving birth to a giant, as Wolfe makes gruesomely explicit.
I wondered about that, since I don't remember another mention of the mothers of the Mice having difficult births. Of course, I don't understand why the human women wouldn't take simple precautions to avoid pregnancy. Based on Wolfe's peculiarly graphic descriptions, the giants wouldn't notice or care.
Andy Robertson04 Jan 2005, 01:07

↳ in reply to David DiGiacomo

Any thoughts on why the blood of the Angrborn is full of parasites? Aside from just making them seeem extra vile?
Andrew Bollen04 Jan 2005, 01:13

↳ in reply to Andy Robertson

2 quoted lines
Andy Robertson wrote: Any thoughts on why the blood of the Angrborn is full of parasites? Aside from just making them seeem extra vile?
No, but maybe it's just an image Wolfe liked & recycled. The giant in ummm that story about dwarves killing a giant in the errrr recent collection (retarded with names, sorry) had macro-things living in his blood also.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.