Berthold at the end
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 13 Jan 2005
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4307

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Kieran Mullen — 13 Jan 2005, 10:11

     When do we stop worrying about spoilers?

     Extra space for those who are worried about such things.



     Dum dee dee.....



     Ok.  Able heals Berthold at the end.  Wolfe writes that this is 
particularly difficult.  Some have taken this to mean that some part of 
Berthold died and had to be replaced by part of Ben.    I don't see it. 
  It makes sense to me that since Berthold has been basically brain 
damaged for decades, it would be a bit hard to reverse.  Moreover, it's 
much harder to do than fixing a body.   How do you alter the way 
someone thinks and still have them be the same person at the end?   In 
addition IIRC  Berthold and Gerda are restored to their youth.  So it 
just makes sense that this is difficult.

    Of course, I don't understand the relationship between Able and Art 
or Berthold and Ben.  I have to reread "The Knight" and then reread 
"The Wizard."

    Sigh.

     Kieran Mullen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes — 13 Jan 2005, 10:17
  in reply to Kieran Mullen

> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:11:24 -0600, Kieran Mullen <kieran at ou.edu> wrote:
> 
>      When do we stop worrying about spoilers?

The first of this year was the more or less agreement.

>      Ok.  Able heals Berthold at the end.  Wolfe writes that this is
> particularly difficult. 

To be fussy, Arthur/Able writes that. Meaning that while Wolfe 
actually wrote the words, he wrote them in A's narratorial voice,
which - Wolfe being Wolfe - means we have to consider why he
wrote that and whether it is strictly speaking "true." I think it is
- I think A is the most "reliable" narrator in the Lupine oeuvre -
but we do need to keep these distinctions clear. 8*)

> Of course, I don't understand the relationship between Able and Art
> or Berthold and Ben.

Oh, what a surprise ... Identity issues in a Wolfe novel...

I think that the *first* problem for TWK criticism must be an
understanding of the relationship between Mythgarthr and Earth.

--Dan'l

  --
  www.livejournal.com/users/sturgeonslawyer
  Freedom has no barcode.
       --J.G. Ballard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------