cthulhu mythos, BotNS
The Urth list — 21 messages, 10 voices, 02 Jun 2005
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4432
don doggett02 Jun 2005, 14:37
I googled to see if this had been touched on in the
archives and I didn't find anything, but forgive me if
I'm going over old ground. I'm in the process of
reading a collection of short stories by August
Derleth, set in Lovecraft's universe. The stories are
quite good so far, and it seems to me that perhaps
Derleth, rather than Lovecraft, was a greater
influence on Wolfe regarding the nature of Abaia and
the rest and their conflict with the Hiero's. The
very fact of a conflict seems to bear this out as
Derleth sets the Great Old Ones (Cthulhu etc) against
the Elder Gods who, interestingly enough, reside in
Orion. There is no such dichotomy in Lovecraft, to
the best of my knowledge. There is also mention of
some of these creatures living forward in time and
plenty of references to something thundering in places
beneath the earth (the resemblance to the mines of
saltus is uncanny). Another persistent theme I have
noticed in Derleth's stories is the ability of
forbidden knowledge to corrupt. The simple reading of
passages from the Necronomicon or the other evil texts
from these stories is often enough to set a character
on the path to his doom. This makes me wonder about
Severian's possession of the Lives of the 17
Megatherians (isn't that one of the books in his
sabertache?) and where his loyalties lie.
Don
nastler03 Jun 2005, 00:46
↳ in reply to don doggett
Small point; The book 17 Megatherians dosn't go in the
sabertache, it stays in the library. The "corrupting"
influence on Sev probably comes to him through Thecla,
who is a good bet for having read 17 Megs...
I'd like to hear more discussion about the Great Old
Ones / Elder Gods. I think it's only been referenced
before, not chewed to the marrow the way things are
usually done on this list.... :-)
nastler
--- don doggett <kingwukong at yahoo.com> skrev:
42 quoted lines
I googled to see if this had been touched on in the
archives and I didn't find anything, but forgive me
if
I'm going over old ground. I'm in the process of
reading a collection of short stories by August
Derleth, set in Lovecraft's universe. The stories
are
quite good so far, and it seems to me that perhaps
Derleth, rather than Lovecraft, was a greater
influence on Wolfe regarding the nature of Abaia and
the rest and their conflict with the Hiero's. The
very fact of a conflict seems to bear this out as
Derleth sets the Great Old Ones (Cthulhu etc)
against
the Elder Gods who, interestingly enough, reside in
Orion. There is no such dichotomy in Lovecraft, to
the best of my knowledge. There is also mention of
some of these creatures living forward in time and
plenty of references to something thundering in
places
beneath the earth (the resemblance to the mines of
saltus is uncanny). Another persistent theme I have
noticed in Derleth's stories is the ability of
forbidden knowledge to corrupt. The simple reading
of
passages from the Necronomicon or the other evil
texts
from these stories is often enough to set a
character
on the path to his doom. This makes me wonder about
Severian's possession of the Lives of the 17
Megatherians (isn't that one of the books in his
sabertache?) and where his loyalties lie.
Don
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Andy Robertson03 Jun 2005, 05:50
↳ in reply to nastler
nastler writes:
11 quoted lines
Small point; The book 17 Megatherians dosn't go in the
sabertache, it stays in the library. The "corrupting"
influence on Sev probably comes to him through Thecla,
who is a good bet for having read 17 Megs...
I'd like to hear more discussion about the Great Old
Ones / Elder Gods. I think it's only been referenced
before, not chewed to the marrow the way things are
usually done on this list.... :-)
nastler
I honestly don't think there is much direct reference.
However, Lovecraft's "Old Ones" were really non-supernatural alien entities of such power that they could not be distinguished from gods, from the human perspective.
It's arguable that he was the first really influential writer to do this - to address the idea of gods, from a rigorously non-supernatural perspective.
Wolfe has many non-omnipotent "gods" of this type: Erebus and Abia are godlike in their power as far as humans are concerned, but there is nothing really supernatural about them.
.
pthwndxrclzp03 Jun 2005, 09:27
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
What exactly are Erebus and Abaia's "powers"? Despite lots of scary intimations and background threats, it doesn't seem as if we really have much information on what such creatures can do, beyond some kind of low-level mind control (and perhaps having their lieutenants "swim" through time upon occasion). Or am I missing something?
1 quoted line
Wolfe has many non-omnipotent "gods" of this type: Erebus and Abia are godlike in their power as far as humans are concerned, but there is nothing really supernatural about them.
Andy Robertson03 Jun 2005, 09:36
↳ in reply to pthwndxrclzp
pthwndxrclzp writes:
1 quoted line
What exactly are Erebus and Abaia's "powers"? Despite lots of scary intimations and background threats, it doesn't seem as if we really have much information on what such creatures can do, beyond some kind of low-level mind control (and perhaps having their lieutenants "swim" through time upon occasion). Or am I missing something?
Much like Cthulhu's. They have half-human submarine servitors; they control dreams; they will rise in the last days to take the world. But more to the point they control much of the Urth's surface through their enslaved human servants.
They are not exactly GOO's but then Cthulhu was small beans compared to chappies like YogSothoth or Azathoth.
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
I take that "rise in the last days to take the world" bit with a grain of salt; it seems more like a bit of standard mythology crusted on to whatever the original story was. The big bad nasties always rise in the last days to contend for dominion over the world. And any self-respecting big-bad-nasty will make sure everyone fears that, one of these days, it will be back...
Andy said:
3 quoted lines
Much like Cthulhu's. They have half-human submarine servitors; they control dreams; they will rise in the last days to take the world. But more to the point they control much of the Urth's surface through their enslaved human servants.
They are not exactly GOO's but then Cthulhu was small beans compared to chappies like YogSothoth or Azathoth.
James Wynn03 Jun 2005, 11:30
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
1 quoted line
I honestly don't think there is much direct reference.
Maybe, maybe not. But there is some evidence that Wolfe wet his whistle on Lovecraft for THE WIZARD KNIGHT. The only literary reference I know of for "Skai" is the farmland-belted River SKAI beyond which lies the city of Ulthar where it is illegal to kill a CAT.
~ Crush
Maru Dubshinki03 Jun 2005, 11:47
↳ in reply to James Wynn
5 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On 6/3/05, James Wynn <thewynns at earthlink.net> wrote:
I honestly don't think there is much direct reference.
Maybe, maybe not. But there is some evidence that Wolfe wet his whistle on Lovecraft for THE WIZARD KNIGHT. The only literary reference I know of for "Skai" is the farmland-belted River SKAI beyond which lies the city of Ulthar where it is illegal to kill a CAT.
~ Crush
I take it that that reference for Skai is drawn for a Lovecraft story?
~Maru
Andy Robertson03 Jun 2005, 11:57
↳ in reply to James Wynn
3 quoted lines
Maybe, maybe not. But there is some evidence that Wolfe wet his whistle on Lovecraft for THE WIZARD KNIGHT. The only literary reference I know of for "Skai" is the farmland-belted River SKAI beyond which lies the city of Ulthar where it is illegal to kill a CAT.
~ Crush
We know Wolfe likes Lovecraft (vide the fake Necronomicon in PEACE) but despite that I don't agree this Skai is in any way related.
James Wynn03 Jun 2005, 12:54
↳ in reply to Maru Dubshinki
7 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
I honestly don't think there is much direct reference.
Maybe, maybe not. But there is some evidence that Wolfe wet his whistle on Lovecraft for THE WIZARD KNIGHT. The only literary reference I know of for "Skai" is the farmland-belted River SKAI beyond which lies the city of Ulthar where it is illegal to kill a CAT.
~ Crush
I take it that that reference for Skai is drawn for a Lovecraft story?
~Maru
Oh, yeah, sorry. THE CATS Of ULTHAR among others.
Maru Dubshinki03 Jun 2005, 13:40
↳ in reply to James Wynn
9 quoted lines · 1–4 deep
On 6/3/05, James Wynn <thewynns at earthlink.net> wrote:
I honestly don't think there is much direct reference.
Maybe, maybe not. But there is some evidence that Wolfe wet his whistle on Lovecraft for THE WIZARD KNIGHT. The only literary reference I know of for "Skai" is the farmland-belted River SKAI beyond which lies the city of Ulthar where it is illegal to kill a CAT.
~ Crush
I take it that that reference for Skai is drawn for a Lovecraft story?
~Maru
Oh, yeah, sorry. THE CATS Of ULTHAR among others.
Jeff Wilson03 Jun 2005, 17:22
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
14 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
Andy Robertson wrote:
nastler writes:
Small point; The book 17 Megatherians dosn't go in the
sabertache, it stays in the library. The "corrupting"
influence on Sev probably comes to him through Thecla,
who is a good bet for having read 17 Megs...
I'd like to hear more discussion about the Great Old
Ones / Elder Gods. I think it's only been referenced
before, not chewed to the marrow the way things are
usually done on this list.... :-)
nastler
I honestly don't think there is much direct reference.
However, Lovecraft's "Old Ones" were really non-supernatural alien entities of such power that they could not be distinguished from gods, from the human perspective. It's arguable that he was the first really influential writer to do this
- to address the idea of gods, from a rigorously non-supernatural perspective. Wolfe has many non-omnipotent "gods" of this type: Erebus and Abia are godlike in their power as far as humans are concerned, but there is nothing really supernatural about them.
Perhaps; they are certainly an order of being below that of the Pancreator, but they and their servants have qualities and insights into
the divine truth beyond that of mere mortals, even if they attmpet to deny that truth. Lovecraft's axioms in the background of his Mythos stories do not admit a difference in kind of the natural world and the supernatural forces at work, only that the fallible human mind calls the parts of nature that escape its full grasp "supernatural" and that the nature of these ancient beings are so alien that the mind destructivetly fails in its attempt to perceive their character.
Sarah Dorrance-Minch07 Jun 2005, 19:45
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
3 quoted lines
--- Andy Robertson <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk> wrote:
I honestly don't think there is much direct
reference.
I can't see any either.
(By way of introduction: Hi, my name's Sarah, my SCA
friends call me Midori which I prefer anyway; I
discovered Gene Wolfe and the Timescape books last
year, totally by accident, and got hooked. My husband,
much to my amusement, when he saw me reading something
called In The Shadow of the Torturer, asked me,
"What's that? A romance novel?" but he got a little
more interested when I clobbered him over the head
with the book and told him that it was anthropological
science fiction.)
5 quoted lines
Wolfe has many non-omnipotent "gods" of this type:
Erebus and Abia are
godlike in their power as far as humans are
concerned, but there is nothing
really supernatural about them.
I would LOVE to see a cross-over written by Wolfe and
Steven Brust. I have no idea how Vlad Taltos and
Severian the Lame would encounter each other, although
I imagine it would probably not be on Urth since I
can't see Vlad travelling off his own planet; but
there are certain similarities. Gods that aren't
supernatural (or really even gods, but might as well
be). A mixture of science and magic. Interesting
antiheroes who are a lot nicer inside than they think
they are (the Han Solo syndrome, if you want to call
it that). Interesting backstory in the form of made-up
myths and legends.
Midori/Sarah
Ah, love couldst thou and I conspire/ To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire/ Would we not break it all to bits, and then/ Remold it nearer to the heart's desire - Omar Khayyam
Reach me a gentian, give me a torch
let me guide myself with the blue, forked torch of this flower
down the darker and darker stairs, where blue is darkened on blueness.
- D.H. Lawrence, "Bavarian Gentians"
Andy Robertson07 Jun 2005, 23:48
↳ in reply to Sarah Dorrance-Minch
Sarah Dorrance-Minch writes:
9 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
--- Andy Robertson <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk> wrote:
I honestly don't think there is much direct
reference.
I can't see any either.
(By way of introduction: Hi, my name's Sarah, my SCA
friends call me Midori which I prefer anyway;
Welcome: Guillaume of Dublin (from the Far Isles) here :-)
2 quoted lines
I would LOVE to see a cross-over written by Wolfe and
Steven Brust.
Now, I haven't read ANY Brust: is he good??? Is he, uh, Wolfey?
hartshorn
.
David Duffy08 Jun 2005, 01:04
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
7 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Andy Robertson wrote:
Sarah Dorrance-Minch writes:
I would LOVE to see a cross-over written by Wolfe and
Steven Brust.
Now, I haven't read ANY Brust: is he good??? Is he, uh, Wolfey?
hartshorn
You have to read at least one of his novels.
Brokedown Palace is pretty indirect. It might be the closest to say
Short Sun. Brust channels Dumas very well too -- I was reading recently that Dumas's dialogue is as it is merely because he was paid by the word.
David Duffy
Maru Dubshinki08 Jun 2005, 08:17
↳ in reply to David Duffy
14 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
On 6/8/05, David Duffy <David.Duffy at qimr.edu.au> wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Andy Robertson wrote:
Sarah Dorrance-Minch writes:
I would LOVE to see a cross-over written by Wolfe and
Steven Brust.
Now, I haven't read ANY Brust: is he good??? Is he, uh, Wolfey?
hartshorn
You have to read at least one of his novels.
Brokedown Palace is pretty indirect. It might be the closest to say
Short Sun. Brust channels Dumas very well too -- I was reading recently that Dumas's dialogue is as it is merely because he was paid by the word.
David Duffy
Funny- I heard the same exact thing about Dickens.
Probably explains why I never could finish 'the Pickwick Papers'.
Incidentally, have you read "To Reign in Hell"? That sounds like the most Wolfe-ian of his stuff.
~Maru
Sarah Dorrance-Minch10 Jun 2005, 20:22
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
3 quoted lines
--- Andy Robertson <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk> wrote:
Now, I haven't read ANY Brust: is he good??? Is
he, uh, Wolfey?
Good? I think so. I like his tie-ins to Romanian and
other eastern European folklore, his filk, his dry
sense of humour, his ability to make extremely
antiheroic characters sympathetic, his versatility,
his ability to create worlds.
All of which aside from the ethnic stuff are strengths
Wolfe also has. But is he Wolfey? I wouldn't say so.
His style is for the most part far less ruminative.
You won't get the philosophical discussions. You will
get good characterization, style, plot, and
anthropological interest.
Midori/Sarah
Ah, love couldst thou and I conspire/ To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire/ Would we not break it all to bits, and then/ Remold it nearer to the heart's desire - Omar Khayyam
Reach me a gentian, give me a torch
let me guide myself with the blue, forked torch of this flower
down the darker and darker stairs, where blue is darkened on blueness.
- D.H. Lawrence, "Bavarian Gentians"
Sarah Dorrance-Minch10 Jun 2005, 20:23
↳ in reply to David Duffy
7 quoted lines
--- David Duffy <David.Duffy at qimr.edu.au> wrote:
Brokedown Palace is pretty indirect. It might be
the closest to say
Short Sun. Brust channels Dumas very well too --
I was reading recently
that Dumas's dialogue is as it is merely because he
was paid by the word.
Oh yeah. Brust is also very good at pastiche.
Sarah Dorrance-Minch10 Jun 2005, 20:27
↳ in reply to Maru Dubshinki
4 quoted lines
--- Maru Dubshinki <marudubshinki at gmail.com> wrote:
Incidentally, have you read "To Reign in Hell"? That
sounds like the
most Wolfe-ian of his stuff.
At least in theme.
I think the series about Vlad Taltos comes closer in
terms of character development and cultural background
(a society with distinct castes, a hero whose career
is less than savoury initially, semidivine beings who
play puppet-master behind the scenes, oh so subtly).
Midori/Sarah
Ah, love couldst thou and I conspire/ To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire/ Would we not break it all to bits, and then/ Remold it nearer to the heart's desire - Omar Khayyam
Reach me a gentian, give me a torch
let me guide myself with the blue, forked torch of this flower
down the darker and darker stairs, where blue is darkened on blueness.
- D.H. Lawrence, "Bavarian Gentians"
Andy Robertson11 Jun 2005, 01:29
↳ in reply to Sarah Dorrance-Minch
Sarah Dorrance-Minch writes:
2 quoted lines
Good? I think so. I like his tie-ins to Romanian and
other eastern European folklore, his filk
He perpetrates filks? This is problematic ;-)
Sarah Dorrance-Minch11 Jun 2005, 20:38
↳ in reply to Andy Robertson
2 quoted lines
--- Andy Robertson <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk> wrote:
He perpetrates filks? This is problematic ;-)
I think he was one of the original instigators of the
movement.
Midori/Sarah
Ah, love couldst thou and I conspire/ To grasp this sorry scheme of things entire/ Would we not break it all to bits, and then/ Remold it nearer to the heart's desire - Omar Khayyam
Reach me a gentian, give me a torch
let me guide myself with the blue, forked torch of this flower
down the darker and darker stairs, where blue is darkened on blueness.
- D.H. Lawrence, "Bavarian Gentians"
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.