# TWK: Able's future

*The Urth list — 5 messages, 4 voices, 07 Dec 2005*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4523>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Roy C. Lackey
*07 Dec 2005, 05:09*

Last month I wrote:
[snip]

>> And, at the end, even though Able turned his back on Skai, it seems he
>> will be given a position in a still higher realm than Skai;<< [snip]

That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's
association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos. Able wrote from
Aelfrice, where he saw the events in Mythgarthr play out across the sky. He
mentioned a future time when he will return to Mythgarthr. The "great lord"
mentioned by Michael as being in need of a champion is not God, who has no
need of one, least of all in Kleos. We are told that there are other worlds
on all the levels except the first and last. It may be that the "great lord"
in need of a champion is on another world on the fourth level, a world other
than Dream or Mythgarthr. Maybe our own. It may even be that the "great
lord" is on a world on the third level other than the Valfather's. That
might be the explanation for the apparent mixing of unrelated Celtic
(Gawain) and Norse traditions that Able seems to have experienced, a
cross-contamination of worlds in the same way that he went from America to
Mythgarthr.

-Roy

---

### James Wynn
*07 Dec 2005, 05:34 · in reply to Roy C. Lackey*

Roy says:

> That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's
> association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos.

Hmm...maybe. But why would Michael seek Able's help for a lord in Skai?
Michael went seeking Able--seeking an Able that didn't exist when Able first
met him. The idea of proceeding ever upwards seems to be the overall theme
of the novel. Michael is only the second person from Kleos (at best) that
Able has met. Is it surprising that Able would be a hero in Kleos? Look how
quickly Able seems to have risen to prominence in Skai.

J

---

### Roy C. Lackey
*07 Dec 2005, 20:52 · follows James Wynn*

> Crush quoted and wrote:
> Roy says:

>> That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's
>> association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos.

> Hmm...maybe. But why would Michael seek Able's help for a lord in Skai?
> Michael went seeking Able--seeking an Able that didn't exist when Able
> first
> met him. The idea of proceeding ever upwards seems to be the overall theme
> of the novel. Michael is only the second person from Kleos (at best) that
> Able has met. Is it surprising that Able would be a hero in Kleos? Look how
> quickly Able seems to have risen to prominence in Skai.

It would surprise the hell out of me for Able to even get to Kleos, much
less be a hero there. As hartshorn said in another context, Able is a knight
not a saint. Just who would a crude dude like Able fight in God's backyard?
Kleos was a place made by God as a reward for the "servants" he had created.
(W, 46) (I think those "servants" are what are usually called angels.)

Because anything apart from God is by definition less than perfect, those
servants were unhappy with that imperfection in Kleos. They wanted to cast
out as much of that imperfection as they could. God created a place for them
to put it, which was Skai. The imperfection was embodied in the form of the
giant Ymir. "Some servants of the Highest God surrendered their places in
Kleos and went down to kill him. They did, but they could never go back."
(ibid.) Some hold that the Valfather was one of those who descended and
could never return. (48) (Echoed by Able leaving Skai?) The farther removed
from God's perfection, the worse the corruption, descending by degrees to
evil.

Able was no angel, and I don't think he ever would/could be. I don't think
it's even theoretically possible for a post-creation being to attain the
status of a pre-creation being. But this begins to stray into religious
territory it's probably better not to traverse.

I don't think Able was all that prominent in Skai; clearly he was nowhere
near as powerful as the Valfather and his immediate family, and/or the other
original "servants" of God.

Michael didn't meet Able in Kleos, so clearly he had come down from his high
place. Presumably he was able to return, unlike his brother servants/angels
who went down to Skai. What's the difference?

-Roy

---

### don doggett
*10 Dec 2005, 04:12 · in reply to Roy C. Lackey*

> --- "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net> wrote:
> Michael didn't meet Able in Kleos, so clearly he had
> come down from his high
> place. Presumably he was able to return, unlike his
> brother servants/angels
> who went down to Skai. What's the difference?
> 
> -Roy

Angels are by definition messengers of God, so it only
makes sense that Michael can travel wherever he needs
to do his duties. Able is special because he is human.
 According to Christian belief, we are God's special
children and this whole setup is for our benefit,
though we are unworthy of it. At least that's my
understanding. I'm not sure I buy that in the "real
world" but for the purpose of story that's the
situation. I think.

Don

---

### Andy Robertson
*10 Dec 2005, 09:22 · in reply to don doggett*

don doggett writes: 

>  According to Christian belief, we are God's special
> children and this whole setup is for our benefit,
> though we are unworthy of it.

 

I don't believe this is the case in any of Wolfe's fictional universes.   
Humans may be special, but so are the Neighbours.  Everyone is special. 

I suspect the thing that bound the descended angels to Skai was probably the 
slaying of Ymir and the shedding of Ymir's blood.

---
