17 megatherians The Urth list — 11 messages, 7 voices, 19 May 2006 https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4598 Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. ============================================================================== b sharp — 19 May 2006, 01:30 There are theories on why the number 17 might be important as a significant and/or evil number to Gene Wolfe in BotNS. Because Noah's flood happened on 'February' 17? Because Gene Wolf was in the 17th company (or some other military division) in Korea? These aren't compelling to me. Since the Ascians, the slaves of Erebus, have often been compared to communist/socialist societies (Group of 17, Gang Of Four?), the possibility of a 17 member Politburo as inspiration is appealing. I think there is circumstantial evidence to suggest Wolfe is no fan of communism. But my research suggests the typical politburo membership was 12-15 in the USSR and 7 for the equivalent in China. Why pick 17 to be important? Now, Abaia and Erebus are clearly the primary megatherians. To me, Abaia with his vast bulk and network of agents might invoke the USSR while Erebus with billions of slaves who all look alike and quote from a book of stock phrases might invoke China. Of course these two nations were the major communist powers in the 70's. Perhaps the other megatherians represent the other established communist nations existing in some degree of collaboration or servitude to the major two at the time of BotNS's writing. My list of those nations would be Cuba, E. Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Albania, Mongolia, N. Korea, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Laos and Burma. 15. + 2. I know this list is an easy target for the sarcohamphi but, well...the 17 had to come from somewhere and this might be it. Without the New Sun would we have had to add the People's Republic of Baldanders? ugh. Interesting that Wolfe chose to have the Ascians originate from what is probably the current USA. -bsharp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ thalassocrat at nym.hush.com — 19 May 2006, 02:29 follows, by subject match b sharp > On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:30:11 +1000 b sharp > wrote: > Now, Abaia and Erebus are clearly the primary megatherians. I've never understood why people assume this. "Megatherians" = "Big animals". Why think of Abaia, Erebus et al as "animals"? On the other hand, I suppose you could think of the "Group of 17" as composed of 17 individuals each under the control of a different "megatherian". But to me it's a red herring. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adam Thornton — 19 May 2006, 03:14 in reply to b sharp > On May 18, 2006, at 8:30 PM, b sharp wrote: > There are theories on why the number 17 might be important as a > significant > and/or evil number to Gene Wolfe in BotNS. Because Noah's flood > happened on > 'February' 17? Because Gene Wolf was in the 17th company (or some > other > military division) in Korea? These aren't compelling to me. It's the number used to mean "infinite" by the Minotaur in the Borges story "The House of Asterion." "Group of Seventeen" thus becomes "Everyone"--quite literally The Will of The People. Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ b sharp — 19 May 2006, 03:27 follows, by subject match Adam Thornton thalassocrat expresses: > I've never understood why people assume this. "Megatherians" = "Big > animals". Why think of Abaia, Erebus et al as "animals"? > On the other hand, I suppose you could think of the "Group of 17" as > composed of 17 individuals each under the control of a different > "megatherian". But to me it's a red herring. I use the megatherian term as a convention only, is there an alternate term? So Thalassocrat is of the school who feel "they" (is it even 17?) are human? I profess no strong stance at this juncture. However, Abaia is refered to as "great beast" is he not? And Wikipedia chimes in with- (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therian) > Therian in the English language has two distinct definitions: > -In taxonomy, the term refers to a member of Theria, a subclass of advanced > mammals. -In anthropology and in certain psychological/spiritual > subcultures, therian refers to a variety of >otherkin who identify with > animals or shapeshifters; a person who believes in, possesses some > characteristics of, or subscribes to the spiritual or shamanic (not the > folkloric) definition of >therianthropy or who belongs to the therianthropy > subculture. ooh I like the idea of Wolfe using of a bit of both of those definitions but that second one..whew! It happens over and over. Is he a genius or what? But I think we are getting somewhere....piece by piece.... -bsharp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roy C. Lackey — 19 May 2006, 04:43 follows, by subject match b sharp > bsharp wrote: > Since the Ascians, the slaves of Erebus, have often been compared to > communist/socialist societies (Group of 17, Gang Of Four?), the possibility > of a 17 member Politburo as inspiration is appealing. I think there is > circumstantial evidence to suggest Wolfe is no fan of communism. But my > research suggests the typical politburo membership was 12-15 in the USSR > and 7 for the equivalent in China. Why pick 17 to be important? Fwiw, according to M.A.-D. in LEXICON URTHUS, "The number seventeen alludes to the Soviet politburo, which typically had seventeen members (eleven to twelve full members and six to nine alternate members)." (p-118) -Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ maru dubshinki — 19 May 2006, 05:51 in reply to Adam Thornton > On 5/18/06, Adam Thornton wrote: > On May 18, 2006, at 8:30 PM, b sharp wrote: > > There are theories on why the number 17 might be important as a > > significant > > and/or evil number to Gene Wolfe in BotNS. Because Noah's flood > > happened on > > 'February' 17? Because Gene Wolf was in the 17th company (or some > > other > > military division) in Korea? These aren't compelling to me. > It's the number used to mean "infinite" by the Minotaur in the Borges > story "The House of Asterion." > > "Group of Seventeen" thus becomes "Everyone"--quite literally The > Will of The People. > > Adam Are you sure about that, Adam? In my Collection Fictions, there are some footnotes and interpolations mentioning that where the translator rendered as "infinite", Borges wrote in the Spanish, "14"- not "17". ~maru ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adam Thornton — 19 May 2006, 06:47 in reply to maru dubshinki > On May 19, 2006, at 12:51 AM, maru dubshinki wrote: > On 5/18/06, Adam Thornton wrote: > > On May 18, 2006, at 8:30 PM, b sharp wrote: > > > There are theories on why the number 17 might be important as a > > > significant > > > and/or evil number to Gene Wolfe in BotNS. Because Noah's flood > > > happened on > > > 'February' 17? Because Gene Wolf was in the 17th company (or some > > > other > > > military division) in Korea? These aren't compelling to me. > > It's the number used to mean "infinite" by the Minotaur in the Borges > > story "The House of Asterion." > > > > "Group of Seventeen" thus becomes "Everyone"--quite literally The > > Will of The People. > > > > Adam > Are you sure about that, Adam? In my Collection Fictions, there are > some footnotes and interpolations mentioning that where the translator > rendered as "infinite", Borges wrote in the Spanish, "14"- not "17". Well, that would certainly bugger up my theory. Um, I'll look tomorrow. Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adam Thornton — 19 May 2006, 14:20 in reply to Adam Thornton > On May 19, 2006, at 1:47 AM, Adam Thornton wrote: > > On May 19, 2006, at 12:51 AM, maru dubshinki wrote: > > Are you sure about that, Adam? In my Collection Fictions, there are > > some footnotes and interpolations mentioning that where the > > translator > > rendered as "infinite", Borges wrote in the Spanish, "14"- not "17". > Well, that would certainly bugger up my theory. > > Um, I'll look tomorrow. It's 14. Well, it was a nice theory while it lasted. I guess that makes more sense: 14 is as high as the Minotaur can count. Ten fingers, two hooves, two horns. Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Wilson — 20 May 2006, 05:19 in reply to thalassocrat at nym.hush.com > thalassocrat at nym.hush.com wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2006 11:30:11 +1000 b sharp > wrote: > > Now, Abaia and Erebus are clearly the primary megatherians. > I've never understood why people assume this. "Megatherians" = "Big > animals". Why think of Abaia, Erebus et al as "animals"? They are "great beasts" with occult power, as Aleister Crowley styled himself on occasion. Abaia and Erebus, being inhuman Things Man Was Not Meant to Know, also count as great beasts in a more literal sense. -- Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com < http://www.io.com/~jwilson > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ brunians at brunians.org — 01 Jun 2006, 22:58 in reply to Adam Thornton > On May 18, 2006, at 8:30 PM, b sharp wrote: > > There are theories on why the number 17 might be important ... > It's the number used to mean "infinite" by the Minotaur in the Borges > story "The House of Asterion." No it isn't. . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Adam Thornton — 02 Jun 2006, 02:58 in reply to brunians at brunians.org > > On Jun 1, 2006, at 5:58 PM, brunians at brunians.org wrote: > > On May 18, 2006, at 8:30 PM, b sharp wrote: > > > There are theories on why the number 17 might be important ... > > It's the number used to mean "infinite" by the Minotaur in the Borges > > story "The House of Asterion." > No it isn't. Well, it *should* be. My theory would have succeeded, if it weren't for you meddling facts. Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------