# "Backs to the future"

*The Urth list — 5 messages, 4 voices, 13 Jun 2006*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4652>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### James Machin
*13 Jun 2006, 11:02*

The following article might be of interest to the list (for obvious 
reasons!)...

http://www.physorg.com/news69338070.html

---

### Jeff Wilson
*15 Jun 2006, 04:33 · in reply to James Machin*

> James Machin wrote:
> The following article might be of interest to the list (for obvious 
> reasons!)...
> 
> http://www.physorg.com/news69338070.html

I've seen this claimed for classical Attic cultures as well; IIRC as 
recently as "It's Greek to Me" (Paperback)
by Michael Macrone, Tom Lulevitch

```
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
< http://www.io.com/~jwilson >
```

---

### Transentient
*15 Jun 2006, 13:11 · in reply to Jeff Wilson*

> On Jun 15, 2006, at 12:33 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:
> James Machin wrote:

>> The following article might be of interest to the list (for obvious
>> reasons!)...
>> 
>> http://www.physorg.com/news69338070.html

> I've seen this claimed for classical Attic cultures as well; IIRC as
> recently as "It's Greek to Me" (Paperback)
> by Michael Macrone, Tom Lulevitch

There has been a big resurgence of popularity of the Sapir-Whorf  
hypothesis among anthropology types lately. 

---

### Jeff Wilson
*16 Jun 2006, 04:53 · in reply to Transentient*

> Transentient wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 12:33 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote:

>> James Machin wrote:

>>> The following article might be of interest to the list (for obvious
>>> reasons!)...
>>> 
>>> http://www.physorg.com/news69338070.html

>> I've seen this claimed for classical Attic cultures as well; IIRC as
>> recently as "It's Greek to Me" (Paperback)
>> by Michael Macrone, Tom Lulevitch

> There has been a big resurgence of popularity of the Sapir-Whorf  
> hypothesis among anthropology types lately. 

I think this is more in Skinner's area, myself. Certainly Greeks and 
Romans were conditioned to see the past as a place of glory and names 
forever remembered, with the future a mysterious, unseen place from 
which fate and misfortune could strike unforseen, as if stabbing from 
behind.

```
Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com
< http://www.io.com/~jwilson >
```

---

### brunians at brunians.org
*06 Jul 2006, 15:44 · in reply to James Machin*

It makes perfect sense once you think of it.

We can see the past, and we cannot see the future. Might as well have our
backs to it.


josh

____

> The following article might be of interest to the list (for obvious
> reasons!)...
> 
> http://www.physorg.com/news69338070.html
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________

---
