Old Urth vs. New Urth

The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 03 Jul 2006
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4659

Fred Kiesche03 Jul 2006, 22:33
Greetings: I have "Urth" in the origina four-volume set from Timescape (Pocket Books, those were the days!). Is there any reason to get the new Tor/Orb omnibus editions? Text that was excised put back in? Corrected errors? Etc. Thanks! Fred Kiesche (FPK3) My books are water; those of great geniuses are wine. Everybody drinks water. (Mark Twain, "Notebook") Over 7,000 postings served! See The Eternal Golden Braid (http://theeternalgoldenbraid.blogspot.com/ ).
Dan Rabin04 Jul 2006, 13:52

↳ in reply to Fred Kiesche

Fred Kiesche asks:
7 quoted lines
Greetings: I have "Urth" in the origina four-volume set from Timescape (Pocket Books, those were the days!). Is there any reason to get the new Tor/Orb omnibus editions? Text that was excised put back in? Corrected errors? Etc.
There are no significant divergences that I've ever noticed. Some typos are corrected, some retained, some introduced perhaps. The omnibus is missing the poetic epigram for Citadel of the Autarch (Kipling, "At two-o'clock in the morning..."). I recall also that there's a spuriously repeated passage late in Citadel in the original that's corrected in the Tor edition. I haven't conducted a detailed comparison, but I have read the old paperbacks several times and have compared any text that strikes me as different while reading the Tor editions. I made marginal pencil notes of thes (whether they turned out to be differences or not), and could flip through and list them if there's any demand. You might also consider whether the physical state of your originals will sustain your intended level of future use. -- Dan Rabin

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.