# Old Urth vs. New Urth

*The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 03 Jul 2006*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4659>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Fred Kiesche
*03 Jul 2006, 22:33*

Greetings:

I have "Urth" in the origina four-volume set from
Timescape (Pocket Books, those were the days!). Is
there any reason to get the new Tor/Orb omnibus
editions? Text that was excised put back in? Corrected
errors? Etc.

Thanks!



          Fred Kiesche (FPK3)
  
  My books are water; those of great geniuses are wine. Everybody drinks water. (Mark Twain, "Notebook")
Over 7,000 postings served! See The Eternal Golden Braid (http://theeternalgoldenbraid.blogspot.com/ ).

  
  

---

### Dan Rabin
*04 Jul 2006, 13:52 · in reply to Fred Kiesche*

Fred Kiesche asks:

> Greetings:
> 
> I have "Urth" in the origina four-volume set from
> Timescape (Pocket Books, those were the days!). Is
> there any reason to get the new Tor/Orb omnibus
> editions? Text that was excised put back in? Corrected
> errors? Etc.

There are no significant divergences that I've ever noticed.  Some 
typos are corrected, some retained, some introduced perhaps.  The 
omnibus is missing the poetic epigram for _Citadel of the Autarch_ 
(Kipling, "At two-o'clock in the morning...").  I recall also that 
there's a spuriously repeated passage late in _Citadel_ in the 
original that's corrected in the Tor edition.

I haven't conducted a detailed comparison, but I have read the old 
paperbacks several times and have compared any text that strikes me 
as different while reading the Tor editions.  I made marginal pencil 
notes of thes (whether they turned out to be differences or not), and 
could flip through and list them if there's any demand.

You might also consider whether the physical state of your originals 
will sustain your intended level of future use.

   -- Dan Rabin

---
