The Old Autarch and Paeon
The Urth list — 3 messages, 3 voices, 28 Aug 2006
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4702

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Dan Rabin — 28 Aug 2006, 22:56

I have always interpreted the passage mentioning Paeon the 
honey-steward to be saying that the Old Autarch received instruction 
regarding the succession from someone he knew to be an aquastor of 
Paeon, his trusted teacher from his youth.

In other words, Paeon is to Old Autarch as Malrubius is to Severian.

This has seemed completely obvious to me since my second reading 
(which was the first for catching many internal references).

Independently, I'm one of those who doesn't think that the Old 
Autarch is Appian, precisely for the reason already cited that 
Appian's name is mentioned as a historical autarch, but the Old 
Autarch's name is never mentioned in any scene where he is present or 
even definitely referred to.

I have toyed with the idea that there's some sort of taboo on names 
of Autarchs during their reigns, but Severian wouldn't have to 
abserve such a stricture at the time he's writing.  Perhaps he has 
trouble distinguishing the Old Autarch from himself ever since the 
successional encephelophagy.

In case anyone needs another puzzle to speculate about, it has long 
annoyed me that Severian describes the Autarch on the counterfeit 
chrisos from Vodalus as androgynous, which I have (since second 
reading) always assumed to mean that it's the Old Autarch (the only 
one since Ymar to take the test in Yesod), yet Severian needs 
Thecla's memories to recognize the guy as the Autarch when he 
actually meets him.

   -- Dan Rabin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

thalassocrat at nym.hush.com — 28 Aug 2006, 23:42
  follows, by subject match Dan Rabin

> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:56:46 +1000 Dan Rabin <wolfe-
> lists at danrabin.com> wrote:
> I have always interpreted the passage mentioning Paeon the 
> honey-steward to be saying that the Old Autarch received 
> instruction 
> regarding the succession from someone he knew to be an aquastor of 

> Paeon, his trusted teacher from his youth.
> 
> In other words, Paeon is to Old Autarch as Malrubius is to 
> Severian.
> 
> This has seemed completely obvious to me since my second reading 
> (which was the first for catching many internal references).

A quick "me too"; I don't see how this can be in dispute, but maybe 
I'm missing something.

> In case anyone needs another puzzle to speculate about, it has 
> long 
> annoyed me that Severian describes the Autarch on the counterfeit 
> chrisos from Vodalus as androgynous, which I have (since second 
> reading) always assumed to mean that it's the Old Autarch (the 
> only 
> one since Ymar to take the test in Yesod), yet Severian needs 
> Thecla's memories to recognize the guy as the Autarch when he 
> actually meets him.

And how is it that people around the House Absolute don't recognize 
the the servitor as the Old Autarch? I think maybe there are some 
"continuity" glitches here.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. C. Radish Mosswalls — 29 Aug 2006, 17:47
  follows, by subject match thalassocrat at nym.hush.com

Dan said, *"In case anyone needs another puzzle to speculate about, it has
long
annoyed me that Severian describes the Autarch on the counterfeit
chrisos from Vodalus as androgynous, which I have (since second
reading) always assumed to mean that it's the Old Autarch (the only
one since Ymar to take the test in Yesod), yet Severian needs
Thecla's memories to recognize the guy as the Autarch when he
actually meets him."
*
The general impression I get is that the profile of the Autarch on the
coinage never changes. And to me it makes sense for an unchanging,
androgynous image since the Autarch isn't just one guy, but a whole group of
different people in one body. Just an idea.

-Jessie

------------------------------------------------------------------------------